Lzh Mu Bi Vb Pc 9Criticizing Robe Distribution
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Discourse on Criticizing Robe Distribution (Dubbala)
Background
This discourse is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pācittiya section, the middle disciplinary rules of the Buddhist Saṅgha community. These regulations were established by the Buddha based on specific events that occurred in the Saṅgha, in order to protect the spirit of practice and the harmony of the religious community.
For the discourse "Dubbala" (translated as "Criticizing Robe Distribution"), the arising context was a situation in the early Saṅgha. Some monastics interfered with, criticized, or condemned the way other monastics distributed robes, including inner cloths and outer robes of monastics. This was not a small matter; in the Buddhist tradition of practice, the distribution of communal property, especially robes, directly reflects fairness, mutual respect, and internal discipline.
The Buddha recognized that interfering with or criticizing the distribution carried out by those responsible could create discord, weaken concentration in practice, and undermine trust in the community. Therefore, he set forth a rule to restrain this conduct.
Main Content
This Pācittiya rule states that if a monastic criticizes the way robes are distributed by those assigned the task, such as selected monastics or managers of communal property, that person commits a Pācittiya offense, an offense requiring confession before the Saṅgha for purification.
The important point to understand is that this rule does not prohibit legitimate comments or proposals regarding distribution. Rather, it targets the act of "criticizing," meaning publicly, harshly, or intentionally condemning in order to shame others or create discord. If a monastic has sincere views on the matter of distribution, that person should approach it privately and respectfully, or bring it into formal discussion of the Saṅgha, rather than criticizing publicly.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.