Lzh Mu Bi Pm Pd 6Asking for Molasses
Pāli / Sanskrit:Phāṇitaviññāpana
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Sutta on Asking for Molasses (Phāṇitaviññāpana)
Background
The Sutta on Asking for Molasses belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda Buddhist tradition and is recorded in the Pāli Canon. The regulations concerning food and drink in the Bhikkhu discipline are not merely simple restrictions, but deeply reflect the Buddha’s philosophy of practice: the balance between minimally nourishing the body and the goal of liberation, and compassion that does not allow devas or people to be exploited.
In the Buddha’s time, molasses (phāṇita) was a rare food, often used as medicine or as a sweet drink that restored strength. The story of bhikkhus asking for molasses reflects a common situation in the early monastic community, when monks wished to use special foods for reasons of health or practice.
Main Content
In this regulation, the Buddha allows bhikkhus to ask for molasses, but under clear conditions. Molasses is regarded as a medicinal support (bhesajja), usable when necessary for health, not because of craving or a need for luxury.
However, the manner of asking must also follow a certain principle. Bhikkhus may not actively demand of laypeople: “Bring me molasses.” Instead, if asked, they may answer plainly that molasses is good for health, allowing the layperson to decide for himself or herself whether to offer it. This approach protects the trust of the community, because it avoids any suspicion that bhikkhus are taking advantage of the faith and generosity of laypeople.
The regulation also clearly distinguishes between accepting a voluntarily offered gift and actively “stimulating” generosity. This is a subtle expression of Buddhist ethics, preserving what is good in interactions between the Sangha and the community of supporters.
Practical Meaning
The Sutta on Asking for Molasses teaches that steadfastness in the discipline is not mechanical rigidity or inflexibility.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.