Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mu Bi Pm Pc 43Making Stains

Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbaṇṇakaraṇa

📖293 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the Dubbaṇṇakaraṇa Discourse (Making One Disreputable)

Background

The Dubbaṇṇakaraṇa discourse is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pāṭimokkha Saṃvara, the collected code for the monastic community. This discourse appears in the context of the Buddha establishing ethical rules to protect the purity of the Sangha and maintain the reputation of the Dharma. The rules were set forth not out of harshness or punitive intent, but in order to preserve the dignified image of those gone forth.

Dubbaṇṇa means “bad, disreputable, of poor reputation,” and karaṇa means “making, producing.” Thus the title of the discourse indicates actions that bring discredit upon the individual and the community of practice. It is not an abstract spiritual discourse, but a practical disciplinary text on social reputation and ethical conduct.

Main Content

In the context of the Vinaya Piṭaka, the Dubbaṇṇakaraṇa discourse concerns actions that cause monastics to lose honor, thereby adversely affecting the Dharma. These actions include gestures inappropriate to one’s duty, discourteous communication, or participation in worldly activities unsuited to the status of one gone forth.

The Vinaya Piṭaka emphasizes that monastics must preserve dignity in body (kāya), speech (vāca), and mind (mano). Even the smallest gestures can cause loss of honor, such as speaking loudly in public, laughing or talking without solemnity, or displaying excessive intimacy with laypeople. Each action is considered through the lens of its effect on the confidence of others.

The important point is that the Theravāda discipline does not place emphasis on punishment, but is concerned with the monastic’s own recognition of the wrong nature of the act and self-correction. Self-restraint (saṃyama) is central, not out of fear of criticism, but from understanding that improper action harms one’s own practice and the community’s trust.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.