Lzh Mi Bi Pm Pc 59Making Stains

Making Stains (Dubbaṇṇakaraṇa)

Sutta entry: Lzh Mi Bi Pm Pc 59 | Tradition: Sectarian Canon · Comparative | Collection: Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

---

Source Status

This is an AI explanation composed entirely on the basis of the supplied descriptive information. The full original Chinese source text of this training rule has not been directly collated in the system, and no detailed summary is attached. Therefore, this explanation cannot reproduce the Buddha’s specific teaching, does not quote the original wording, and does not describe the characters or circumstances of the rule’s formulation in detail. All content presented below is inferred from the title, the Pāli technical term, and the position of the training rule within the context of comparative sectarian Vinaya studies, not from direct access to the full original scripture.

---

Background

This sutta entry belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Chinese, a genre of research and synthesis that gathers disciplinary rules from many different sectarian traditions and places them in comparison in order to highlight similarities and differences in the systematization of the Vinaya. The number Lzh Mi Bi Pm Pc 59 indicates that this is the fifty-ninth training rule in the Pācittiya group within the Bhikkhunī Pātimokkha, that is, the code for bhikkhunīs, recorded according to the Chinese system in relation to sectarian comparison.

The term Pācittiya refers to a group of training rules whose violations are lighter than grave rules such as Pārājika or Saṅghādisesa; a Pācittiya offense requires confession and acknowledgment before another person in order to clear the fault. This reflects the educational and restorative spirit of Buddhist jurisprudence, not aiming at punishment but at helping one gone forth recognize faults, purify the body of discipline, and continue the holy life.

---

Content Identifiable From the Descriptive Information

The Pāli term Dubbaṇṇakaraṇa is formed from two parts: dubbaṇṇa (to make ugly, to spoil beauty, to discolor, to stain) and karaṇa (action, deed, making). This phrase is translated into Vietnamese as “Làm Ố Bẩn” and into English as Making Stains, both indicating the intentional act of damaging, dirtying, or causing an object to lose its cleanliness or original condition.

In the context of disciplinary rules for bhikkhunīs, the act of “making stains” is usually related to deliberately damaging or soiling robes, utensils, or property of the Sangha, or possibly to the destruction of items offered as donations or entrusted for safekeeping. The background of training rule Pācittiya 59 in the bhikkhunī section often reflects a specific concern for preserving and respecting property, robes, and the sense of responsibility of one gone forth toward communal items or offerings given by faithful donors.

However, because the full comparative source text is unavailable, it is not possible to determine exactly the constituent conditions of the offense (sambhāra), exceptions (anāpatti), or ruling (āpatti) stated in this training rule according to each sectarian tradition. These details may differ significantly among different Vinaya traditions, and that comparison is precisely the scholarly purpose of the collection to which this entry belongs.

---

Meaning for Practice

The training rule on “Making Stains” carries a deep educational meaning beyond the range of a mere rule. On the level of practice, it reminds those gone forth of the spirit of contentment and respect: receiving what is offered with a grateful heart and using it carefully, without waste, disregard, or intentional damage.

Furthermore, this training rule is closely connected with the attitude of the mind. The act of damaging or soiling an object often arises from carelessness, disregard, or even anger and irritation, mental states that the discipline always aims to tame and transform. When one gone forth is aware of each action toward the objects around them, they are at the same time cultivating attentiveness (sati) and a mindful attitude in all daily activities.

From a sectarian perspective, the preservation of this training rule in the Chinese tradition and its possible comparison with the Pāli Pātimokkha shows its importance in maintaining the dignity and integrity of the bhikkhunī community across centuries and many geographical traditions. This is evidence of the continuity of the Vinaya as the shared foundation of the renunciant life, even though each sectarian tradition has its own modes of expression.

---

Comparative Note

Because this explanation is built entirely from descriptive information, readers who wish to study more deeply should consult the corresponding Chinese text directly in the Comparative Vinaya system, and also compare it with the Bhikkhunī Pātimokkhas of the relevant sectarian traditions in order to verify the definition, offense conditions, and specific exceptions of this Dubbaṇṇakaraṇa training rule according to each tradition.