Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mu Bi Pm Pc 114Not Guiding Disciple After Ordination

Pāli / Sanskrit:Sahajīvinī-ananuggahaṇa

📖981 words · ~4 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Source Status

This Vietnamese text has been regenerated in the form of an AI interpretation, not as a translation of the original scripture or Vinaya text. The data provides the number “Lzh Mu Bi Pm Pc 114,” the Vietnamese title “Không Hướng Dẫn Đệ Tử Sau Khi Thọ Giới,” the English title “Not Guiding Disciple After Ordination,” the Pali/comparative title “Sahajīvinī-ananuggahaṇa,” the tradition “Comparative Sectarian Scriptures,” the collection “Comparative Vinaya — Chinese,” and the source path. The truncated ending speaks about neglecting and failing to guide a disciple who has been formally accepted after ordination, and regards this as a violation in the Sangha community.

The full Chinese text is not yet available, there is no complete translation, and no source comparison is available in the present data. Therefore, the sections below do not affirm the circumstance of establishment, the original wording, persons, chapters, or detailed content of the rule. Terms concerning morality, concentration, wisdom, and the life of a disciple are presented as general Buddhist interpretation based on the title and the remaining ending, not as literal quotations.

Context

The title “Not Guiding Disciple After Ordination” places this item within the scope of a teacher’s responsibility toward a student after that person has formally entered monastic life. Ordination is not the end point of training; on the contrary, it is the time when a newcomer needs even more support. A person who has just received ordination may have made a sincere aspiration, but may not yet have enough experience to discipline body, speech, and mind, to understand rightly the communal way of life, or to recognize inner difficulties.

The remaining ending uses the term “Sahajīvinī” and speaks of a disciple accepted as an official disciple. Within the scope of interpretation, this may be understood as a close teacher-disciple relationship in the life of practice, but the specific legal structure should not be affirmed without the original text. What is certain from the title is that responsibility for guidance after ordination is the focus. If a teacher only accepts a disciple in the initial ceremony and then abandons that person, the acceptance becomes incomplete. In the monastery, the teacher does not only transmit an outward form, but also has the duty to show the way of living, studying, correcting faults, and maturing in the Dharma.

Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information

From the Vietnamese and English titles, the main content can be determined as the fault of not caring for or not guiding a disciple after that person has been ordained. From the number containing the sign “Pc,” it may be noted that this item belongs to a group of rules requiring confession according to the classification in the descriptive information, but the specific procedure should not be further interpreted without the full source. The truncated ending indicates that the teacher must continue to care for and teach the disciple in discipline, practice, and wisdom. However, because this passage is an old, unchecked Vietnamese text, the main idea should be retained without treating each term as an original quotation.

The point that can be clearly determined is that neglecting a disciple is not only a personal shortcoming, but affects the community. A newly ordained person still depends on guidance in order to understand the precepts, deportment, daily routine, and ways of living harmoniously with the assembly. Without a guide, they may commit faults out of ignorance, become discouraged because they are not supported, or misunderstand the ideal of renunciation. Therefore, this rule raises an ongoing responsibility: to accept a disciple is to accept a share of the burden of education and protection.

The ending also shows that this fault is serious because the disciple is often a new person, easily led astray. This is consistent with the spirit of monastic education: newcomers need an orderly environment and a trustworthy person to whom they can ask questions, learn, and correct themselves.

Meaning for Practice

The meaning for practice of this item is first directed to the one who serves as teacher. In Buddhism, guiding others cannot rest only on title or ceremony. The teacher needs presence, patience, and responsibility. Teaching a disciple is not only explaining right and wrong, but helping that person observe their own mind, know moral shame when they err, and return to a pure way of life after initial clumsiness. If the teacher lacks care, the disciple may lose an important support at the stage when wavering is most likely.

For the disciple, this item reminds one that ordination is the beginning of a long life of learning. The student needs to receive instruction humbly, ask actively when something is unclear, and regard correction as a kindness rather than an insult. A teacher-disciple relationship in accordance with the Dharma is not blind dependence, but wise reliance for the sake of maturity.

For the Sangha, this regulation protects the quality of transmission. A community with many ordained people but little guidance will easily weaken from within. Conversely, when newcomers are cared for, the precepts are learned in concrete life, and the faith of laypeople is also strengthened. Educational responsibility is therefore not a private matter between two people, but the foundation of the community’s durability.

Note on Comparison

Because the full text has not been checked, one should not affirm exactly how “Sahajīvinī-ananuggahaṇa” is defined in this text, who the object is, how long guidance lasts, or what the procedure for confession is. Details concerning morality, concentration, and wisdom in this version are interpretations within a Buddhist framework of practice, not wording confirmed from the source. When the Chinese text and parallel versions are available, the terminology, the scope of the teacher’s responsibility, and the accuracy of every point stated here need to be checked again. The present version has value only as a cautious interpretation replacing the truncated Vietnamese body.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.