Lzh Mi Bu Vb Pc 58Disrespect
Pāli / Sanskrit:Anādariya
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Source Status
This entry has the following descriptive information: number Lzh Mi Bu Vb Pc 58, belonging to the Sectarian Buddhist Texts, Chinese Parallels Vinaya group, with the Vietnamese title “Bất Kính,” the English title “Disrespect,” and the Pali title Anādariya. This is an AI interpretation in Vietnamese, not a verbatim translation. The data does not provide the full text of the rule, does not provide the introductory story, and also does not state precisely the object of the disrespectful act, the form of disrespect, or the conditions that constitute a fault. Therefore, this section presents only what can be inferred from the descriptive information and from the truncated ending of the content.
The ending shows that the earlier interpretation was speaking about respect in the community of practice, the danger of arrogance, refusal to learn, and a Pācittiya fault requiring confession. However, statements such as “The Buddha taught that...” in the ending cannot be confirmed as quotations or original content from the source under consideration. Here it is necessary to speak more cautiously: in the spirit of the Vinaya, disrespect weakens the capacity to learn the Dharma and live together harmoniously.
Background
The renunciant life is a life of reliance upon the training rules, upon teachers and companions, and upon the Sangha. If a person holds only to their own view, refuses to listen, dismisses reminders, or despises shared rules, that person harms not only themselves but also destabilizes communal life. Therefore, disrespect is not simply a lack of outward etiquette. It reflects a state of mind difficult to instruct: thinking oneself sufficient, not wanting correction, and not recognizing the value of discipline.
In an environment of practice, respect is not meant to reinforce personal power. A teacher, an elder, or an experienced fellow practitioner is respected because they represent the continuity of Dharma learning and Vinaya learning. Respect here is an attitude of opening to what is right, not blind obedience. When the Vinaya treats disrespect as something requiring confession, this shows that a community of practice needs a pliant psychological foundation, able to receive, able to lower itself before what is wholesome.
Content That Can Be Determined From the Descriptive Information
From the titles “Bất Kính,” “Disrespect,” and Anādariya, it can be determined that the topic revolves around an attitude of lack of respect or insufficient regard for something that should be respected. The number Pc 58 shows that this entry belongs to the Pācittiya group in the bhikkhu section of the Chinese parallel Vinaya. Thus the focus is likely an act or attitude that needs to be acknowledged and confessed, in order to restore purity in relation to the precepts and the Sangha.
The descriptive information does not state toward whom the disrespect is directed: it may be toward a training rule, instruction, a person giving admonition, a ritual, or the community. Because the full text is absent, no specific case should be asserted. What can be said is that the word Anādariya generally suggests lack of respect, lack of regard, or failure to receive something with a serious mind. In the Vinaya context, such disregard becomes dangerous because it diminishes the capacity for self-correction. When one who has committed a fault also looks down on admonition, a small fault can become a large habit.
The truncated ending also emphasizes that respect is a condition for progress in practice. This point can be retained at the level of interpretation: without respect, the learner has difficulty receiving the teaching; without mutual respect, the community has difficulty maintaining harmony; without humility before the precepts, confession easily becomes a mere formality.
Meaning for Practice
The meaning for practice in this rule lies in recognizing respect as an inner practice. One may bow correctly in ritual while inwardly remaining obstinate; one may speak gently while not truly being willing to learn. True respect begins from seeing that one can still be wrong, still needs instruction, and still needs to be illuminated by the Dharma and Vinaya. This mind makes the study of the path alive.
Disrespect often accompanies conceit. When admonished, we easily become defensive; when advised, we easily look for reasons; when we meet someone who keeps the precepts more strictly, we easily regard them as rigid. This training rule invites the practitioner to turn back and observe that reaction. If the admonition is correct, we should be grateful and amend ourselves. If the admonition is not skillfully given, we can still receive the part that is correct without nourishing opposition. Thus respect does not weaken a person, but helps the mind be less controlled by the self.
For modern communities, the spirit of Anādariya is also very practical. In any Buddhist study group, lack of respect may appear in the form of dismissing common rules, speaking sarcastically about those who maintain discipline, or refusing to listen simply because the person offering feedback is not to one’s liking. A healthy community does not require everyone to be the same, but it does need a foundation of respect for the Dharma, respect for truth, and respect for the process of correction. When a person confesses a disrespectful attitude, that person is protecting their own capacity to learn the path.
Notes on Collation
This entry has not yet been checked against the full source text at the address recorded in the descriptive information. Therefore, every interpretation concerning the object of disrespect, the circumstances of offense, and the manner of handling should be understood only as a generalization based on the title and the Pācittiya classification. This passage should not be used to replace a translation of the Vinaya, nor should it be cited as evidence of the original wording of the teaching.
When collation becomes possible, it is necessary to check how the Chinese text records the specific behavior, whether there is a response or admonition in the context, and whether the parallel versions use the same scope of meaning as Anādariya. Until that is completed, this interpretation has value only as an explanation for practice concerning the attitude of respect in life under the Vinaya. The cautious conclusion is: disrespect is understood here as an obstacle to learning the Dharma, confession, and harmony in the Sangha.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.