Lzh Mi Bu Vb Np 7Accepting Too Many Robes

Accepting Too Many Robes - AI Exposition

Lzh Mi Bu Vb Np 7 · Tatuttari
Comparative Vinaya - Chinese · Sectarian Canon · Comparative

---

Source Status

This is an AI exposition compiled on the basis of the existing descriptive information. The original full text of this Vinaya rule has not yet been directly collated in the system, and therefore there is no literal translation to quote. Everything presented below is built purely from the identifiable elements in the descriptive information - including the rule name, sequence number, sectarian tradition, and text genre - together with general knowledge of the Buddhist Vinaya system. Readers should consult reliable editions of the Chinese Vinaya for the exact full text.

---

Background

This text belongs to the collection Comparative Vinaya - Chinese, within the comparative Sectarian Canon corpus that compares Buddhist sectarian traditions. The designation Lzh Mi Bu Vb Np 7 shows that this is the seventh rule in the Nissaggiya Pācittiya group (Ni-tát-kỳ Ba-dật-đề) - the class of rules connected with "forfeiture of the object and confession" - belonging to the Vibhaṅga (analysis of the rules) in the Vinaya for bhikkhus (Mi Bu).

The Nissaggiya Pācittiya group is one of the important categories of offense in the Vinaya system, characterized by a dual nature: the offender must not only perform confession before the Sangha but must also forfeit the object involved - in this case, robes - before the confession can be accepted. This structure reflects the spirit of the Vinaya: it regulates not only conduct but also the material consequences of the violation.

The Pāli name of the rule is Tatuttari, a term related to the meaning "exceeding the prescribed number" or "more than what is allowed."

---

Content Identifiable from the Descriptive Information

From the Vietnamese title "Thọ Nhận Y Quá Số" and the English title "Accepting Too Many Robes", the central content of this rule concerns the act of receiving robes beyond the number allowed by the Vinaya.

In the Vinaya tradition, the robes (cīvara) of a bhikkhu are strictly regulated both in number and in the manner of receiving them. An ordinary bhikkhu is generally permitted to possess only a defined number of robes - usually the three principal robes. Receiving additional robes beyond the prescribed number, whether from a donor's kindness or from unexpected circumstances, may constitute an offense if there is no special permission from the Sangha or if the required procedures are not followed.

This rule may include matters related to:

• Definition of "too many" - that is, the threshold number of robes a bhikkhu may receive at a given time;
• Exceptions or circumstantial conditions considered mitigating;
• Procedure for handling the offense: the offending object must be forfeited (nissagga) before the Sangha or before an individual according to the rule, and only afterward is confession (pācittiya) performed;
• Analysis of each factor constituting the offense, a typical feature of the Vibhaṅga genre.

The name Tatuttari suggests a semantic analysis of "above that" or "more than that amount," fitting the content of receiving robes beyond the permitted measure. This is the seventh rule in the sequence and may continue the logic of earlier rules concerning robes and bhikkhu requisites.

---

Meaning for Practice

This rule has profound meaning for practice, not merely as an administrative regulation about property. It reflects the foundation of fewness of wishes and contentment - one of the core virtues of the life gone forth.

When a bhikkhu limits the number of robes to the permitted amount, he trains in not being drawn along by accumulation and not allowing the mind to be bound to material things. In this context, robes are not only cloth for covering the body but a symbol of the relationship between the monastic and worldly possessions. A clear boundary between "enough" and "too much" helps protect the practitioner's mind from gradually slipping toward craving and accumulation.

Furthermore, the procedure of forfeiture before confession teaches the monastic a practical lesson: it is not enough merely to speak words of admission; one must take concrete action to correct the consequences. This is the spirit of complete responsibility in the life of the Sangha.

For students of Vinaya from a comparative sectarian perspective, studying this rule in its Chinese version also opens an opportunity to understand how different sectarian traditions interpret the same foundational principle - thereby seeing both the unity in spirit and the diversity in expression of the Buddha-Dharma.

---

Comparative Note

The full text of rule Lzh Mi Bu Vb Np 7 has not yet been directly collated from the original source in the present system. Researchers wishing to understand the details should consult the relevant Chinese Vinaya editions of the corresponding sectarian tradition, and compare them with equivalent rules in other Vinaya traditions in order to gain a comprehensive view of this rule's place and meaning within the Buddhist disciplinary system.