Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mi Bi Vb Pc 26Eating Unoffered Food

Pāli / Sanskrit:Dantapona

📖297 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the Dantapona Sutta: Eating Food Not Yet Offered

Background

Dantapona is a rule established by the Buddha within the Vinaya to protect the purity of the Sangha. In the context of the Vinaya Piṭaka, this sutta relates to the Pātimokkha, the ethical code for bhikkhus, specifically to the prohibitions in the Pācittiya section—offenses heavier than Dukkaṭa but lighter than Saṅghādisesa.

The sutta arose from occasions when the Buddha witnessed bhikkhus acting out of desire, not waiting for an official offering from faithful laypeople, but taking food on their own to eat. This conduct violates the spirit of living on alms (piṇḍapāta), one of the four basic requisites of a Buddhist bhikkhu. The arising of this rule shows the importance of dependence on the faith and merit of lay followers, as well as maintaining the boundary between bhikkhus and lay society.

Main Content

The prohibition against eating food not yet offered (anuppadinna) states that a bhikkhu must not take and eat food that the owner has not actively offered. This includes many specific cases: taking food from another person’s house without being invited; harvesting from another person’s garden without permission; or even eating leftovers without the owner’s clear consent.

This prohibition has clearly defined exceptions. A bhikkhu may eat food that has been clearly offered, whether directly or indirectly through an indicating action. In addition, if food is spoiled or discarded as waste, a bhikkhu is not forbidden to eat it without needing permission.

Violation of this rule is regarded as Pācittiya, an offense requiring confession before another bhikkhu (patidesanīya). It is not a very grave offense such as Pārājika, which entails loss of status, but it must be dealt with within the Sangha in order to maintain the purity of the community.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.