Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mi Bi Vb Pc 10Annoyance

Pāli / Sanskrit:Vilekhana

📖989 words · ~4 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Source Status

This entry is an AI interpretation based on the provided descriptive information: the item number “Lzh Mi Bi Vb Pc 10,” the Chinese Comparative Vinaya tradition, the Vietnamese title “Bực Bội,” the English title “Annoyance,” and the Pali name “Vilekhana.” The present Vietnamese text was truncated in the passage discussing practical meaning, so the full original content, the context for establishing the rule, related persons, or the specific wording of the rule cannot be confirmed. The data does not provide the Chinese text, a complete translation, or a comparative commentary.

Therefore, what follows should not be regarded as a translation of the original scripture. It is a limited interpretation, based only on the title and the truncated tail, from which one can recognize the general theme: annoyance, causing irritation, or conduct that harms harmony in monastic life. Specific details such as who spoke to whom, which actions are listed in the original text, or the precise manner of handling the matter are not affirmed without a complete source.

Context

In the life of the Sangha, harmony is not an abstract ideal but an essential condition for practice. Renunciants live near one another, relying together on the Vinaya, schedule, duties, and mutual admonition. Even a word spoken without mindfulness, an attitude intended to irritate others, or a manner of conduct that makes another’s mind uneasy can diminish the quality of communal dwelling.

The title “Annoyance” suggests a kind of defilement that is often taken lightly. Many people think that only major acts such as theft, sexual misconduct, serious lying, or violence are matters of concern. But the Vinaya often enters into subtle expressions of mind: irritability, sarcasm, ways of causing another to lose face, deliberate stirring up of dissatisfaction, or disrespectful attitudes toward fellow practitioners.

In a setting of practice, defilement is not merely an individual inner matter. When expressed through speech and action, it becomes social karma. One annoyed person can unsettle many people; one habit of causing irritation can make the whole community lose the peace needed for practice.

Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information

From the titles “Annoyance” and “Bực Bội,” the main theme can be identified as a kind of conduct that causes disturbance or gives rise to irritation. The Pali name “Vilekhana” in the data is linked with this entry, but because there is no original source text, one should not infer too much about its technical meaning or the structure of the provision. The marker “Pc” shows that this belongs to a group of rules involving confession within the classification system of the precept code, but the data is insufficient for presenting the specific procedure.

The truncated tail mentioned slander, creating discord, and the need to guard speech, thought, and action within the community. This may be used to recognize the interpretive style: emphasizing the ethics of communication and the responsibility not to harm others. Still, those phrases should not be turned into assertions that the original text lists exactly those actions.

What can be said with greater certainty is that this entry concerns the need for monastics to be careful about the psychological and communal effects of their conduct. Annoyance is not only a passing feeling; when nurtured, it becomes a way of seeing others through an oppositional mind, then manifests as sharp speech or actions that destroy harmony.

Meaning for Practice

The practical meaning first of all is to recognize defilement while it is still very small. Anger does not always flare up into harsh words. Often it appears as a cold expression, an ambiguous remark, deliberate delay, a critical attitude, or a way of pointing out faults that wounds the other person more than it helps. If practitioners keep the precepts only at the coarse level and do not illuminate these subtle motives, their practice will lack depth.

A rule concerning annoyance reminds us that a community of practice needs a discipline of loving-kindness. Loving-kindness is not permissiveness. Practitioners can still give feedback, admonish, or protect principles. But speech in accordance with the Dharma must be aimed at benefit, timely, measured, and not arise from the wish to make the other person suffer. When one is still governed by anger, even speech that seems correct can become a means of harm.

For modern life, this lesson is very close at hand. In families, workplaces, Dharma centers, or online spaces, annoyance often spreads quickly. One harsh reaction can trigger many other reactions. A Buddhist practitioner needs to learn to stop before speaking, observing whether the words about to be spoken aim to clarify the truth or merely to discharge irritation. That pause is precisely where precepts, concentration, and wisdom meet.

Practice does not mean never feeling annoyed. What matters is not identifying with it, not feeding it with defensive reasoning, and not giving it the authority to govern speech. When practitioners see the mind of annoyance, they return to the breath, recognize body and mind, and then choose the response that causes the least harm. That is the living practice of the Vinaya.

Collation Note

This entry has not been compared with the full source text in the data. There is not enough data to confirm the context for establishing the rule, the scope of the conduct, the definition of the term, or the specific confession procedure. The interpretations above use only the descriptive information and the truncated tail to present the general ethical meaning.

When a complete source becomes available, one should check in what sense “Vilekhana” is used in this entry, whether the rule targets speech, bodily action, mental attitude, or a specific kind of irritation-causing conduct. It is also necessary to compare how the “Pc 10” group in this Chinese tradition corresponds with other Vinaya systems. Before such collation is done, this text should be read as a practical suggestion about mindfulness in communication and the preservation of harmony.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.