Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mi Bi Pm Pc 28Storing Food

Pāli / Sanskrit:Sannidhikāraka

📖987 words · ~4 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Source Status

This entry is an AI interpretation based on the supplied descriptive information: the Vietnamese title "Storing Food," the English title "Storing Food," the Pali term "Sannidhikāraka," the item number "Lzh Mi Bi Pm Pc 28," belonging to the Chinese comparative Vinaya group within the Sectarian Canon tradition. The truncated ending of the Vietnamese text suggests that the previous text was discussing a Pācittiya rule related to keeping food aside, emphasizing that the central concern is not merely the amount of food but the intention to store it for the future with a mind of greed.

The source has not been directly compared in full text, so this is not treated here as a translation of an original scripture, nor are the specific persons, circumstances giving rise to the rule, or particular exceptions confirmed beyond what the descriptive information and ending passage state.

Context

In Buddhist Vinaya study, rules connected with food are often intended not only to regulate material activity, but also to protect the renunciant life of fewness of wishes, contentment, and proper dependence. Food is a basic need, but it is also a place where the mind of greed can cling in subtle forms: fear of lack, the wish to keep the better portion, excessive worry about the future, or seeing accumulation as a guarantee for the self. Therefore, a rule about storing food should be understood within the broader field of practice: the life of a śramaṇa is built upon simplicity, trust in present causes and conditions, and not allowing material management to overshadow the aspiration for liberation.

The truncated ending suggests that the style was distinguishing between outward action and inward motivation. Not every case in which food is kept should automatically be understood as greed; nor is every form of preparation wrong. The point emphasized is the mind directed toward accumulation, possession, and securing the future through attachment. This reading accords with the spirit of the Vinaya: the precepts are not only legal boundaries, but also means of illuminating mental formations.

What Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information

From the title "Storing Food" and the term "Sannidhikāraka," it can be determined that the main theme is keeping or saving food in monastic life. The item number Pc 28 indicates that it is presented as an item in the Pācittiya group within the comparative system stated, but one should not infer further details about the Chinese text, the narrative background, or the formula of the rule when the data does not provide them. The ending passage clearly states that the conduct of concern is storing food with the intention of setting it aside and accumulating it for the future with a mind of greed.

From the ending passage, it may also be determined that the earlier interpretation mentioned circumstances that might be considered reasonable, such as when a monk is about to be away from the monastery, is ill, or lacks food. However, because this is only the ending of an AI interpretation, those details should not be turned into a definite list of exceptions in the original Vinaya text. It may be said cautiously that the interpretation recognizes a difference between storing out of attachment and preserving something out of a legitimate need in a special circumstance. The important point remains intention: food is received to nourish the body for practice, not to enlarge a sense of ownership.

This item therefore should not be read as a detailed guide to Vinaya procedure. It only helps identify the central line of thought: a renunciant needs to be careful of the tendency to turn need into property, care for the body into an excuse for accumulation, and foresight into a disguised form of craving.

Meaning for Practice

The prominent lesson is that freedom does not come from having many material guarantees, but from the capacity not to be governed by material things. A little food kept with an anxious mind can be much heavier than a life of lack lived with clarity. For a practitioner, rules about food remind us that this body needs nourishment, but it is not worth letting the mind be pulled into calculation, comparison, and grasping.

In lay life, this meaning still has value. Householders have responsibility to care for family, prepare for illness, and stabilize livelihood; that is different from the renunciant life. Yet even in lay life, the storing mind still needs to be observed. When reasonable preparation turns into constant fear of lack, when thrift turns into stinginess, when possession causes the loss of the capacity to share, then the lesson of Sannidhikāraka becomes close at hand. Practice does not require everyone to live the same way, but it requires each person to see clearly what is driving their mind.

The discipline here also teaches trust. A practitioner does not abandon responsibility, but learns to live with present causes and conditions without taking accumulation as the ultimate refuge. Contentment is not poverty, but knowing enough so that the mind is not carried away. When eating, one knows that one is using food to maintain life and practice; when receiving, one knows not to possess; when there is none, one knows not to panic. This is a profound form of practicing mindfulness and non-greed.

Comparative Notes

There has been no direct comparison with the full source text from this data. The observations above are based only on Vietnamese title, English title, Pali title, collection, tradition, item number, and the truncated ending of the Vietnamese text. No translator names, specific Chinese text, canonical location, story of the rule's formulation, or penalty formula beyond the supplied data are confirmed. When full-text comparison becomes possible, the scope of conduct, terminology, exceptions, and the way the Chinese version expresses the idea of "storing" should be checked again so as not to confuse an interpretation for practice with the content of the original Vinaya wording.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.