Lzh Mg Bi Vb Pc 28Accepting Two or Three Bowls Full
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dvittipattapūrapaṭiggahaṇa
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Accepting Two or Three Bowls Full – A Vinaya Analysis
Background
This text belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka in the Theravāda Buddhist tradition, specifically the Pātimokkha (fundamental rules) of the monastic community. The Pācittiya section (offenses requiring confession) governs conduct that, while not a grave transgression, must nonetheless be acknowledged and confessed before the Sangha.
The origin of this rule arose from practical circumstances in monastic life. Certain monastics had accepted excessive quantities of food from donors, going beyond actual need, which led to the hoarding of provisions and harbored the latent danger of attachment to gain. The Buddha, in his supreme wisdom, recognized that such behavior reflected an incomplete relinquishment of the desire for gain, even though it did not constitute a grave offense (Pārājika).
Main Content
The rule of Dvittipattapūrapaṭiggahaṇa (accepting two or three bowls full) stipulates that a monastic should not accept more than two or three bowls full of food from a single donor at one offering. If there are legitimate reasons such as illness or exceptional circumstances, an exception may be made. In ordinary situations, however, accepting food in excess of actual need is regarded as a Pācittiya—that is, an offense requiring confession before the Sangha.
This offense is classified as such because it reflects an inclination toward accumulation and attachment to gain, the mental afflictions that the Buddha's teaching consistently urges practitioners to dispel. The Buddha did not prohibit monastics absolutely from receiving food, since monastics require what is necessary to sustain their health in support of practice. Rather, he encouraged discernment, contentment (Santuṭṭhi), and the relinquishment of material desire.
This rule also reflects a profound principle of the Vinaya: nothing should be stored unnecessarily, for every object has the potential to become a stimulus for craving and a source of distraction in the practice.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.