Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mg Bi Vb Pc 63Needle Cases

Pāli / Sanskrit:Sūcighara

📖340 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Commentary on the Sūcighara Sutta (Needle Cases)

Background

The Sūcighara Sutta belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka within the Theravāda Buddhist tradition, specifically to the Pātimokkha (the fundamental code of monastic rules). It is one of the minor rules (Pācittiya) that the Buddha established to govern the practice life of the Sangha, with the aim of maintaining discipline and the purity of the Bhikkhu community.

The Vinaya Piṭaka is built upon the principle that "without an offense, there is no rule." Each rule arises from a specific incident within the Sangha community: when the Buddha witnessed conduct that was unsuitable, he promulgated regulations to correct and guide the Sangha back to the path of pure practice.

Principal Content

The Sūcighara Sutta concerns the possession and use of needle cases (sūcighara). In the context of the Bhikkhu community during the early period of Buddhism, monks required small and compact tools for mending their robes and maintaining their minimal requisites. However, possessing too many such objects, or concealing them rather than making them known openly to the community, could lead to a loss of communal solidarity and transparency.

In the spirit of the Theravāda Vinaya Piṭaka, the belongings of monastics are to be managed with clarity. Each monk has the right to possess what is essential for the life of practice (the four requisites), but is not permitted to accumulate them without limit or to conceal them. The Sūcighara Sutta reminds practitioners that needle cases must be reported and openly managed within the Sangha — not for the sake of control, but to ensure transparency and to avoid violating the spirit of the going-forth into homelessness.

An act that transgresses this rule is regarded as a Pācittiya offense — a minor infraction requiring public confession before the Sangha. This is not as grave an offense as a Pārājika, yet it still requires the transgressor to confess with due respect and sincerity.

Practical Significance

Although this sutta appears to concern a very minor detail, it contains profound lessons for practice.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.