Lzh Mg Bi Pm Ss 4Litigious
Pāli / Sanskrit:Ussayavādikā
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Sutta Ussayavādikā: On Those Who Are Contentious About Causes
Background
The Sutta Ussayavādikā (Those who argue about causes) is an important part of the Theravāda Vinaya tradition, specifically belonging to the Bhikkhunī Pātimokkha (the Pātimokkha for bhikkhunīs). This sutta appears in the context of the Buddha establishing the rules of conduct for the monastic community, with the aim of maintaining discipline and harmony within the Sangha.
The title "Ussayavādikā" derives from the Pāli word "ussaya" (cause, basis) and "vādi" (one who argues), referring to those who are prone to disputing and questioning the basis or reason behind regulations. The context from which this sutta arises is typically connected to specific events within the monastic community, where certain individuals would not accept the regulations or would persistently raise antagonistic questions about the necessity of the precepts.
Principal Content
The Sutta Ussayavādikā focuses on the Buddha establishing the principle that those who habitually argue and question the regulations of the community (vinaya) in an improper manner are violating the spirit of the Sangha (saṅgha). Rather than quietly practicing in accordance with the Buddha's teachings, the "ussayavādikā" — those who make a practice of seeking "grounds" or "reasons" to refute the established rules — are held up as negative examples.
The Buddha teaches that the fondness for disputing the reasons and grounds of regulations arises from a mind of doubt or a mind of non-submission. This is entirely different from respectfully asking the Buddha questions in order to deepen one's understanding of the Dharma. The sutta emphasizes the distinction between: (1) one who holds genuine doubt and comes to ask the Buddha in order to receive clarification; and (2) one who argues from a mind of non-compliance, always seeking to refute or exploit "loopholes" in the established rules.
The Buddha declares that such conduct violates the precepts of the monastics and disturbs the Sangha. Those who argue excessively will be admonished by the elders (teachers of austere practice) and the Sangha; if they can reform, so much the better — if not, they must submit to disciplinary measures such as paṭisalloma (isolation).
Practical Significance
The deeper significance of this sutta lies in recognizing the quality of mind present when one practices under the Vinaya.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.