Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mg Bi Pm Pc 2Abusive Speech

Pāli / Sanskrit:Omasavāda

📖303 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

The Discourse on Abusive Speech (Omasavāda)

Background

The Omasavāda is found within the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda Buddhist tradition, belonging to the Pātimokkha (the fundamental code of ethical rules). It is one of the explicit precepts established to protect harmony within the monastic community and to govern the pure conduct of those who have gone forth.

The historical context of this text originates from specific incidents that arose within the Sangha during the time of the Buddha. When monastics failed to restrain their speech, insults, mockery, and offensive remarks toward one another easily arose, causing harm to the collective spirit of practice and to mutual respect. For this reason, the Buddha promulgated this rule in order to prevent offensive conduct—particularly harsh speech and groundless ridicule.

Main Content

The discourse prohibits monastics from uttering abusive speech (omasavāda) or making groundless criticisms against fellow monastics. This is a rule of humane enforcement, intended to maintain discipline and mutual respect within the community of practice.

According to the Vinaya Piṭaka, "abusive speech" is understood as words of insult, mockery, or criticism directed at another person's character or actions in a manner that is discourteous or unjust. Such conduct constitutes a violation of the second rule among the Pācittiya offenses applicable to monastics. If a monastic utters abusive speech against another monastic without legitimate grounds or without the intention of instruction, that monastic must confess the offense and seek the forgiveness of the community.

Nevertheless, the text also permits the raising of criticism when there is legitimate reason—such as pointing out actions that violate the Dharma, words that are untrue, or conduct that is not in accordance with the precepts. This is distinguished from abusive speech in that its purpose is correction and guidance, not offense or harm to the spirit of another.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.