Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mg Bi Pm Pc 105Not Following Mentor

Pāli / Sanskrit:Pavattinī-nānubandhana

📖336 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Commentary on the Pavattinī-nānubandhana Sutta

Not Following the Preceptor

Background

This text is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Pāli Canon, reflecting a disciplinary incident within the early Buddhist monastic community. During that period, while the Buddha was still living, monks and nuns who had not yet matured in their practice were required to have a preceptor (ācariya or upajjhāya) to guide and instruct them. The role of the preceptor was of great importance — not only in transmitting the fundamental teachings, but also in educating disciples in monastic discipline, in the cultivation of concentration and wisdom, and in urging them to live in accordance with the thirty-seven factors conducive to enlightenment.

The title "Pavattinī-nānubandhana" (Not following the preceptor) points to a subtle matter: when a junior monk fails to comply with the teachings or guidance of the preceptor, what consequences does this bring upon the individual and upon the Sangha? This text is not a lengthy narrative, but rather a Pātimokkha rule recorded as a warning to the entire community.

Main Content

In the Vinaya Piṭaka, this rule is presented in the context of violations of monastic discipline. When a monk or nun fails to follow the guidance of the preceptor, it is not merely an act of disrespect; it also breaks the bond of practice that the Buddha established. Monastic law requires harmony (samanobhasa) between teacher and disciple — a relationship founded upon trust and principled obedience.

The rule emphasizes that the preceptor is not an authoritarian figure, but rather one who has practiced for many years, possesses diligence, has attained profound realization, and is trusted by the community. The failure to follow (nānubandhana) is not an isolated act of discourtesy, but a violation of a fundamental principle of training. This may take the form of failing to uphold the standards of practice, refusing to accept instruction, or even opposing the preceptor's guidance outright.

This Vinaya text also notes that the preceptor must be a person worthy of respect.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.