Ka Bu Pm Sk 94In Water
Pāli / Sanskrit:Udakeuccāra
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Source Status
This entry is an AI interpretation based on the provided descriptive information: code Ka Bu Pm Sk 94, the Vietnamese title “Trong Nước,” the English title “In Water,” the Pali title “Udakeuccāra,” belonging to the Chinese Comparative Vinaya. The Vietnamese body text was truncated at a passage discussing the use of water, maintaining cleanliness, avoiding harm to small living beings, and its relation to deportment in daily life.
However, the data contains no full source text, no Chinese version, no complete translation, and no commentary. Therefore, it cannot be confirmed exactly what conduct this entry addresses, in what circumstances, or what the scope of the prohibition is. What follows is a cautious interpretation from the descriptive information and the truncated ending, not a translation of the original Vinaya text.
Context
Water is a basic condition of life. In monastic activity, water is used for drinking, washing, bathing, laundering, cleaning utensils, and maintaining communal hygiene. Precisely because it is so commonly used, the way one behaves toward water becomes an important part of deportment. A monastic does not only preserve purity of body and mind in the inward sense; one must also know how to keep the shared environment clean, avoid polluting water sources, and avoid causing inconvenience to others.
The title “In Water” together with the Pali word “Udakeuccāra” suggests a regulation connected with excretion or soiling water. Nevertheless, because the data does not provide the original text, one should avoid interpreting too specifically the exact type of conduct, location, or exception. What can be said is that this entry belongs to the group of training rules on deportment, emphasizing carefulness when a practitioner comes into contact with water. The earlier truncated passage inclined toward two ideas: protecting small living beings and maintaining cleanliness in personal activity. Both can be presented as interpretive directions, with the necessary caution.
Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information
From the descriptive information, it can be determined that the focus is an act occurring “in water” or in relation to water. The Vietnamese and English titles are both very short and are not sufficient to determine the whole content. The supplied Pali term contains the element “udake,” meaning “in water” or “at water,” and the remaining part of the title suggests an issue of impurity or waste. However, this linguistic observation should not be turned into a certain translation of the entire rule without the original text.
The truncated ending discussed not making water “impure” in an ethical sense, avoiding harm to small living beings, and maintaining hygiene while washing hands, feet, and body. It can be determined that the previous interpretive prose understood this entry as a reminder about responsibility toward water environments and toward forms of life that are hard to see. In the spirit of the Vinaya, water sources are not private possessions for an individual to use arbitrarily; they are shared conditions for many people and many species.
At a more certain level, this entry allows three points to be developed: cleanliness in daily activity, respect for water sources, and a non-harming mind toward life. If a monastic pollutes water, the consequence does not stop at bodily uncleanliness; it also makes water unusable for others, disrupts communal life, and may run counter to the spirit of compassion. Details concerning filtering water or choosing another water source should be stated as general interpretations of a careful tradition, not as confirmations of the original wording of this entry.
Meaning for Practice
The meaning for practice in this entry begins with recognizing that purity is not an abstract concept. If one speaks of liberation but is careless with the place where one lives, the water one uses, and the small lives around oneself, then one’s practice has not yet been firmly established in daily life. The Vinaya brings the path into very concrete matters: how to use water, how to avoid making it dirty, whether one thinks of those who come afterward, and whether one sees that even small living beings are worthy of protection.
Water is also an image of interconnection. An action in water can spread farther than the actor imagines. Polluting a water source affects other people, other beings, and the dignity of the place of practice. Thus, this training rule helps the practitioner see that no action is entirely private when it affects shared conditions. Mindfulness is not only knowing the breath; mindfulness is also knowing where one stands, what one uses, and the consequences one leaves behind.
Ethically, this entry nourishes loving-kindness in cases that are difficult to see. Human beings often easily feel compassion for large and recognizable beings, but forget small forms of life in water, in soil, and in the surrounding environment. Though it is not possible to avoid all harm in finite life, practitioners are still taught to reduce carelessness and not to take life lightly because it is small. Precisely this attitude deepens the precept of non-harming.
For laypeople today, this lesson can be extended into Buddhist ecological awareness: not wasting water, not discharging filth carelessly, and not regarding the environment as an inert thing merely for use. Keeping water sources clean means preserving the conditions of life for oneself and others. When small actions are illuminated by loving-kindness, daily life becomes a field of practice.
Comparative Note
Because no full source text is present, this section does not confirm the details of the rule, does not name a translator, does not determine canonical location, and does not add context beyond the data. When comparison becomes possible, item Ka Bu Pm Sk 94 should be checked, especially the exact meaning of the title “Udakeuccāra,” the scope of conduct discussed, and how the Chinese version expresses it. Until such comparison is made, the safest understanding is to read this as an interpretation concerning deportment toward water, communal hygiene, and a non-harming mind in the life of practice.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.