Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Dg Bi Pm Pc 60Obstructing a Legal Procedure

Pāli / Sanskrit:Kammapaṭibāhana

📖269 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the Kammapaṭibāhana Discourse (Obstructing a Legal Procedure)

Background

The Kammapaṭibāhana discourse belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically within the Pātimokkha, the collection of rules for self-regulation among bhikkhus. It is one of the fundamental disciplinary discourses of Theravāda Buddhism, promulgated by the Buddha to govern the monastic community and maintain discipline and harmony in the Sangha.

Kammapaṭibāhana (kamma = act; paṭibāhana = obstruction, hindrance) refers to actions that intentionally obstruct, undermine, or nullify the legal decisions of the Sangha. In this context, the Sangha is the monastic community with authority to decide matters of discipline, address offenses, and perform rites of training and realization. When a lawful decision (kamma) has been made by the whole Sangha or by authorized representatives, deliberately obstructing it is regarded as a serious violation.

Main Content

The Kammapaṭibāhana discourse establishes that if a bhikkhu, after a legal decision (kamma) has been formally passed by the Sangha, intentionally obstructs, interrupts, or seeks to nullify that decision, the act is considered a Pācittiya, one of the lighter offenses in the Theravāda legal system, yet still requiring confession and reform.

Obstruction may appear in many forms: slandering the decision before the Sangha, persuading other members to change their position, concealing or distorting information related to the decision, or organizing disruptive activities to weaken its force.

The reason the Buddha promulgated this rule is clear: to maintain unity in the Sangha. A weak or divided monastic community cannot develop the teaching. If decisions passed democratically and transparently are continually challenged by individual members, the Sangha loses its ability to govern and regulate itself.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.