Lzh Dg Bi Pm Pc 53Living With an Ejected Monastic

Living With an Ejected Monastic — Ukkhittasambhoga

Source Status

This entry is numbered Lzh Dg Bi Pm Pc 53 in the Comparative Vinaya — Chinese collection, within the segment Sectarian Canonical Texts · Comparative. It is a training rule in the collection of precepts for bhikkhunīs (Bi = Bhikkhunī), belonging to the Pācittiya (Pc) group, that is, the class of offenses requiring confession. At present, the corresponding full Chinese source text for this entry has not yet been fully collated and accessed in the system. Therefore, the explanation below is built on the supplied descriptive information together with a general understanding of sectarian Vinaya systems; it is not a full-text translation and does not pretend to reconstruct the original scriptural wording.

---

Background

The term Ukkhittasambhoga (Pāli) may be analyzed in two parts: ukkhitta, meaning “ejected” or “expelled from the Sangha,” referring to a bhikkhu or bhikkhunī who has been formally voted by the Sangha through a legal act to be isolated or deprived of membership status; and sambhoga, meaning “sharing in use, association in daily life, intimate interaction.” Joined together, the term denotes the act of living together, sharing requisites, or maintaining close interaction with one who has been ejected by the Sangha.

In the legal systems of the various schools, this conduct is regarded as a serious violation because it weakens the authority and normative force of Sangha decisions. An act of ejection (ukkhepanīyakamma) is a disciplinary measure that the Sangha has the right to carry out toward members who commit serious breaches of discipline, refuse to acknowledge fault, or persist in wrong views. Once such a person has been ejected, the remaining members of the Sangha have the duty to maintain a certain distance until that person is restored through the proper legal procedure.

This training rule belongs to the Pācittiya section for bhikkhunīs, the group of rules requiring confession before the Sangha or before one or more others when violated. In the comparative sectarian context, a similar training rule may appear in the Vinayas of many different traditions, with minor differences in detail and circumstances of application.

---

Content Determinable From the Descriptive Information

Based on the Vietnamese title “Living With an Ejected Monastic,” the English title “Living With an Ejected Monastic,” and the Pāli term Ukkhittasambhoga, the general content of the training rule may be determined as follows:

• This training rule forbids a bhikkhunī from living together with, sharing a meal with, or maintaining intimate daily association with a bhikkhu or bhikkhunī who has been formally ejected by the Sangha through a legal act.
• Conduct violating this training rule belongs to the offense of Pācittiya, that is, it must be confessed according to the proper legal procedure in order to be purified.
• The training rule reflects the general principle that decisions of the Sangha must be respected, and members may not independently disregard or nullify a collective disciplinary measure by continuing to interact as usual with the disciplined person.
• In the comparative sectarian context, this training rule may reflect minor differences in defining “prohibited association,” whether it includes only eating together, or also studying together, practicing together, or residing in the same space.

---

Meaning for Practice

The training rule concerning Ukkhittasambhoga carries many deep meanings in communal practice:

First, it affirms the sacred character of Sangha procedure (Saṅghakamma). Collective decisions of the Sangha, when carried out in accordance with the Dharma and with the proper quorum, are binding upon the whole community. If an individual arbitrarily breaks such a decision, that person not only violates personal discipline but also harms the foundation of lawful order within the community of practice.

Second, this training rule teaches compassion with wisdom. Sometimes, out of pity or affection, one may wish to continue associating with a person under discipline. But the Vinaya makes clear that true compassion requires maintaining discipline, because only in that way can the other person recognize the fault and return to the path of purity.

Third, the rule reminds us that a community of practice is not a collection of isolated individuals, but an institution with rules, in which each member has responsibility to protect the purity and stability of the whole. Respect for legal acts of the Sangha is an expression of collective responsibility.

---

Comparative Note

Because the full Chinese source text of Lzh Dg Bi Pm Pc 53 has not yet been directly collated in the system, all specific analysis of content, including exceptions, conditions for offense, or degree of offense, must be checked against the corresponding original Vinaya text when access becomes available. Researchers should compare the related sectarian Vinaya texts in order to gain a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of this training rule within its specific lineage context.