Bu Pc 5959. Using assigned property that has not been relinquished
Pāli / Sanskrit:Vikappana
A monk who uses robe-cloth that has been transferred to a fellow monastic must confess the offense.
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Vikappana Sutta — Using Transferred Property That Has Not Been Relinquished
Background
The Vikappana Sutta is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically within the Bhikkhu Pātimokkha — the fundamental code of discipline for monks. The Pātimokkha consists of 227 training rules (or 311 for nuns), arranged into several groups according to the degree of severity of each offense.
This rule belongs to the Pācittiya group — offenses requiring confession before the Sangha. It relates directly to the management of property within the monastic community, a matter of the utmost importance in Theravāda Buddhism.
The historical background of this rule arose from practical situations in the communal life of monks. When a monk determines that a certain article of property is unsuitable for him (such as a robe or a cloth), this is understood to mean that he voluntarily relinquishes ownership and transfers it to another. However, such a transfer must be clearly confirmed and may not be exploited.
Main Content
The Vikappana rule stipulates that a monk may not make use of articles (especially robes — cīvara) that have been transferred to another monk, if he himself has not received clear consent or has not genuinely relinquished ownership.
A specific case: suppose monk A says, "This robe is unsuitable for me," and transfers it to monk B. At that point, the robe is no longer the property of A. If A uses it again without B's agreement, or if B has not clearly received it, then A has violated this rule.
The offense (āpatti) is classified as Pācittiya — a type of offense that must be confessed openly before the Sangha. This is not as grave an offense as Pārājika or Saṅghādisesa, but it reflects an important principle: respect for communal property and for the ownership rights of one's fellow monastics.
The core principle is clarity, transparency, and the absence of deception in the management of monastic property.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.