Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Theravāda — Pali Canon · Vinaya Piṭaka — The Discipline Basket

Bi Pc 4444. Serving householders

Pāli / Sanskrit:Gihiveyyāvacca

📖315 words · ~1 min read
2
Summary

A nun who serves a lay person must confess the offense.

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Serving Householders (Bi Pc 44)

Background

This rule appears in the Bhikkhunī Pātimokkha — the Vinaya code dedicated specifically to bhikkhunīs (fully ordained nuns) in the Theravāda Buddhist tradition. The Vinaya is a collection of behavioral regulations designed to protect the purity of the Sangha, particularly the community of nuns, which is subject to more restrictions and requires greater circumspection.

The rule concerning a bhikkhunī performing services for a householder (gihiveyyāvacca) — that is, attending upon or caring for a lay person in the activities of daily life — was established by the Buddha to protect the discipline within the community of nuns. The fundamental reason is to avoid suspicion: situations that might cause outsiders and members of the Sangha alike to doubt the purity of a female monastic. A bhikkhunī attending excessively upon a lay person may give rise to an emotional attachment incompatible with the nature of the Noble Path.

Main Content

According to Bi Pc 44, if a bhikkhunī performs services for a householder — that is, continually attending upon, preparing food, washing clothing, or carrying out daily tasks for a particular lay person — that bhikkhunī must confess this offense at the pātimokkha recitation (the periodic formal assembly for the recitation of the Vinaya rules).

This action is regarded as a pācittiya — an offense requiring confession and expiation. It is not among the most grave violations (such as those that lead to expulsion from the Sangha), but it reflects a clear principle: a bhikkhunī should maintain spiritual independence and should not cultivate ties of deep attachment to lay people.

This offense is not directed at rendering service in a casual or isolated instance, but at continuous and intensive attendance upon a specific lay person. This distinction is significant, for it shows that the Buddha understood well the danger of emotional entanglement in the life of a monastic.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.