大般若波羅蜜多經
Chinese title:大般若波羅蜜多經
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
12
Furthermore, Subhuti! What do you think? Is the mere designation “the Buddha’s ten powers” a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha” a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “permanent” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “permanent” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “impermanent” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “impermanent” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “blissful” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “blissful” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “suffering” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “suffering” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “self” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “self” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “non-self” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “non-self” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pure” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pure” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “impure” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “impure” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “empty” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “empty” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not empty” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not empty” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “having characteristics” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “having characteristics” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “characterless” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “characterless” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “having aspiration” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “having aspiration” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “aspirationless” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “aspirationless” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “quiescent” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “quiescent” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not quiescent” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not quiescent” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “detached” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “detached” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not detached” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not detached” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “conditioned” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “conditioned” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “unconditioned” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “unconditioned” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with outflows” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with outflows” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without outflows” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without outflows” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “arising” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “arising” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “cessation” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “cessation” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “wholesome” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “wholesome” applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four unhindered knowledges, and the eighteen distinctive qualities of a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not wholesome” applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “nonwholesome” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “culpable” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “culpable” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “blameless” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “blameless” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with afflictions” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with afflictions” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without afflictions” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without afflictions” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “worldly” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “worldly” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “supramundane” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “supramundane” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “defiled” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “defiled” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pure” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pure” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “internal” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “internal” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “external” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “external” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “between the two” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “between the two” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “apprehensible” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “apprehensible” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “inapprehensible” as applied to the Buddha’s ten powers a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “inapprehensible” as applied to the four fearlessnesses, the four analytical knowledges, and the eighteen qualities unique to a Buddha a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
Furthermore, Subhuti, as to what is called a great bodhisattva, what do you think? Is the designation “great loving-kindness” a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity” a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “permanent” as applied to great loving-kindness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “permanent” as applied to great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “impermanent” as applied to great loving-kindness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “impermanent” as applied to great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “happiness” as applied to great loving-kindness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “happiness” as applied to great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “suffering” as applied to great loving-kindness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “suffering” as applied to great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “self” as applied to great loving-kindness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “self” as applied to great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “non-self” as applied to great loving-kindness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “non-self” as applied to great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pure” as applied to great loving-kindness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pure” as applied to great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “impure” as applied to great loving-kindness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “impure” as applied to great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “empty” as applied to great loving-kindness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “empty” as applied to great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not empty” as applied to great loving-kindness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not empty” as applied to great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with characteristics” as applied to great loving-kindness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with characteristics” as applied to great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “characterless” as applied to great loving-kindness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “characterless” as applied to great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with aspiration” as applied to great loving-kindness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with aspiration” as applied to great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “wishlessness” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “wishlessness” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “quiescent” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “quiescent” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not quiescent” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not quiescent” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “detached” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “detached” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not detached” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not detached” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “conditioned” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “conditioned” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “unconditioned” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “unconditioned” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with outflows” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with outflows” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without outflows” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without outflows” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “arising” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “arising” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “cessation” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “cessation” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “wholesome” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “wholesome” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not wholesome” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not wholesome” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “culpable” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “culpable” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “blameless” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “blameless” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with afflictions” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with afflictions” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without afflictions” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without afflictions” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “mundane” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “mundane” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “supramundane” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “supramundane” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “defiled” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “defiled” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pure” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pure” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “internal” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “internal” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “external” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “external” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “between the two” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “between the two” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “apprehensible” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “apprehensible” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “inapprehensible” of great loving-kindness itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “inapprehensible” of great compassion, great sympathetic joy, and great equanimity itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
Furthermore, Subhuti, as for what is called a great bodhisattva, what do you think? Is the designation “the thirty-two marks of a great person” itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “the eighty accompanying characteristics” itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “permanent” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “permanent” of the eighty accompanying characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “impermanent” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “impermanent” of the eighty accompanying characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pleasant” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pleasant” of the eighty accompanying characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “suffering” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “suffering” of the eighty accompanying characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “self” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “self” of the eighty accompanying characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “non-self” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “non-self” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pure” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pure” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “impure” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “impure” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “empty” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “empty” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not empty” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not empty” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “having characteristics” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “having characteristics” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “characterless” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “characterless” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “having aspiration” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “having aspiration” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “aspirationless” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “aspirationless” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “quiescent” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “quiescent” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not quiescent” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not quiescent” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “detached” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “detached” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not detached” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “not detached” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “conditioned” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “conditioned” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “unconditioned” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “unconditioned” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with outflows” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with outflows” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without outflows” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without outflows” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “arising” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “arising” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “cessation” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “cessation” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “wholesome” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “wholesome” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “unwholesome” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “unwholesome” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “blameworthy” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “blameworthy” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “blameless” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “blameless” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “afflicted” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “afflicted” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “unafflicted” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “unafflicted” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “mundane” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “mundane” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “supramundane” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “supramundane” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “defiled” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “defiled” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “purified” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “purified” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “internal” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “internal” of the eighty subsidiary characteristics itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “external” of the thirty-two marks of a great person itself a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the external designation of the thirty-two marks of a great being a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the external designation of the eighty accompanying excellent characteristics a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation between the internal and external of the thirty-two marks of a great being a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation between the internal and external of the eighty accompanying excellent characteristics a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the apprehensible designation of the thirty-two marks of a great being a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the apprehensible designation of the eighty accompanying excellent characteristics a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the inapprehensible designation of the thirty-two marks of a great being a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the inapprehensible designation of the eighty accompanying excellent characteristics a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
Furthermore, Subhuti, as for what is called a great bodhisattva, what do you think? Is the designation of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the permanence of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the permanence of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the impermanence of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the impermanence of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the bliss of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the bliss of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the suffering of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the suffering of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the self of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the self of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the non-self of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the non-self of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the purity of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the purity of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the impurity of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the impurity of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the emptiness of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the emptiness of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the non-emptiness of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the non-emptiness of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of having characteristics of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of having characteristics of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of signlessness of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of signlessness of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of having aspirations of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of having aspirations of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of wishlessness of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of wishlessness of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the quiescence of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the quiescence of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the non-quiescence of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the non-quiescence of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the detachment of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the detachment of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the non-detachment of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the non-detachment of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the conditioned nature of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the conditioned nature of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the unconditioned nature of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the unconditioned nature of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of being contaminated of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of being contaminated of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of being uncontaminated of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of being uncontaminated of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the arising of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the arising of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the cessation of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the cessation of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the wholesomeness of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the wholesomeness of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the non-wholesomeness of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of the non-wholesomeness of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of being blameworthy of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of being blameworthy of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of being blameless of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of being blameless of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of having afflictions of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of having afflictions of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation of being free from afflictions of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “free from afflictions” of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “mundane” of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “mundane” of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “supramundane” of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “supramundane” of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “defiled” of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “defiled” of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “pure” of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “pure” of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “belonging to samsara” of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “belonging to samsara” of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “belonging to nirvana” of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “belonging to nirvana” of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “internal” of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “internal” of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “external” of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “external” of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “between the two” of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “between the two” of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “apprehensible” of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “apprehensible” of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “inapprehensible” of the Dharma of non-forgetfulness a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “inapprehensible” of the nature of constant equanimity a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
Furthermore, Subhuti, as for what is called a great bodhisattva, what do you think? Is the mere designation of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “permanent” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “permanent” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “impermanent” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “impermanent” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “pleasant” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “pleasant” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “suffering” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “suffering” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “self” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “self” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “non-self” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “non-self” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “pure” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “pure” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “impure” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “impure” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “empty” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “empty” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “not empty” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “not empty” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “with characteristics” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “with characteristics” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “without characteristics” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “without characteristics” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “with aspiration” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “with aspiration” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “without aspiration” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “without aspiration” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “quiescent” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “quiescent” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “not quiescent” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “not quiescent” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “detached” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “detached” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “not detached” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “not detached” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “conditioned” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “conditioned” of the knowledge of the aspects of the paths and the knowledge of all aspects a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the mere designation “unconditioned” of the knowledge of all things a great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “unconditioned” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with outflows” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with outflows” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without outflows” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without outflows” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “arising” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “arising” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “cessation” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “cessation” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “wholesome” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “wholesome” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “unwholesome” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “unwholesome” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “culpable” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “culpable” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “blameless” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “blameless” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with afflictions” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “with afflictions” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without afflictions” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “without afflictions” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “worldly” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “worldly” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “supramundane” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “supramundane” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “defiled” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “defiled” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pure” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “pure” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “internal” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “internal” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “external” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “external” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “between the two” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “between the two” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “apprehensible” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “apprehensible” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “inapprehensible” applied to all-knowledge itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
– Is the designation “inapprehensible” applied to the knowledge of path aspects and the knowledge of all aspects itself the great bodhisattva?
– No, Blessed One!
Fascicle 22
End
The version you're viewing was faithfully rendered by Inti AI in keeping with the tradition. Switch to the other language tab to read a human translation.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.