Xct Mu Kd 3Eating More After Refusing an Invitation
Pāli / Sanskrit:Pavāraṇā
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Pavāraṇā Sutta: The Issue of Eating After Refusing an Invitation
Background
The Vinaya Piṭaka records the regulations governing the life of the Buddhist Sangha, intended to maintain discipline and harmony within the monastic community. The Pavāraṇā discourse belongs to the Great Khandhaka section, where the detailed customs of monastics are recorded.
Pavāraṇā, from pavarati, meaning “to open” or “to make public,” was originally an important ceremony at the end of the three-month rains retreat (Vassānta). On this occasion, monastics openly invite their fellow practitioners to point out any negligence or faults committed during the period of practice. However, this section of the discourse revolves around a practical matter in communal life: eating excessively after having declined an invitation.
The background for this rule arose when some bhikkhus refused meal invitations from laypeople, but afterward ate other food, causing contradiction and loss of trust among those who offered support. This was not only an issue of fairness, but also concerned honesty and respect for the interests of the community.
Main Content
The Pavāraṇā discourse stipulates that when a bhikkhu refuses an invitation to a meal (bhojanam) from a layperson or family, he is not permitted to eat any other food (visesabhojana) at that time. In other words, if you say that you cannot accept rice from family A, you cannot immediately turn around and eat rice from family B on the same day.
The deeper reason for this rule is to avoid offending laypeople. When someone offers food with a joyful heart but is refused, they may feel saddened. If they then see that bhikkhu eating with someone else, sadness may turn into loss of trust. This affects the relationship between the Sangha and those who support monastics in religious life.
This rule also reflects the Vinaya principle of protecting harmony within the Sangha and maintaining favorable conditions for practice.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.