Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bu Vb Pj 2Theft

Pāli / Sanskrit:Adinnādāna

📖319 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

THE SUTTA ON TAKING WHAT IS NOT GIVEN

(Adinnādāna — Taking Another’s Property Without Permission)

Background

The Sutta on Taking What Is Not Given, Adinnādāna, is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, specifically in the Pāli Pātimokkha, the first code of discipline, where the rules of conduct that bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs must observe are listed. This is one of the most basic ethical issues in Theravāda Buddhism.

The Buddha’s teaching on Adinnādāna arose from the need to build a community of practice, the Sangha, with clear rules of conduct. When bhikkhus were newly ordained, or when unclear situations arose concerning taking something without the owner’s permission, the Buddha established specific guidelines so that laypeople and bhikkhus could distinguish right from wrong.

Main Content

Adinnādāna is defined as the act of taking anything, from money, food, and clothing to other objects, when the owner has not given permission, with the intention to appropriate it. This is regarded as one of the five basic precepts, Pañcasīla, not only for bhikkhus but also for those who study the Buddha-Dharma.

According to the Vinaya Piṭaka, an action is considered a violation of Adinnādāna when these factors are present: (1) the object belongs to another person, (2) the other person clearly knows it is theirs, (3) the taker is aware that it has not been given, and (4) there is an act of taking or carrying away with the intention to appropriate it.

However, the Buddha also set out specific cases: taking an object if the owner has died, or taking an abandoned object after trying to find the owner and failing, is not considered a violation. In addition, if an object is taken with the owner’s consent, provided that consent is genuinely clear, it is not Adinnādāna.

The Buddha emphasized that this action harms others, parasaṃvattanika, and breaks trust, an essential factor in building a community.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.