Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bu Vb Ay 2Second Undetermined Offence

Pāli / Sanskrit:Dutiyaaniyata

📖297 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

EXPOSITION OF THE DISCOURSE: THE SECOND UNDETERMINED OFFENSE

Background

The Dutiyaaniyata Sutta (the second undetermined offense) belongs to the Aniyata section of the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically the Bhikkhunī Vibhaṅga. The Aniyata section contains five provisions for handling actions whose consequences and degree of offense are not clearly determined from the outset, but depend on the specific circumstances and the intention of the offender.

Buddhist law is built upon the principles of compassion and wisdom, not merely upon rigid regulations. The Aniyata rules reflect this flexibility. They require the Sangha to judge carefully, considering the whole context, motive, action, and consequence of each offense in order to decide the appropriate degree of penalty. This classification allows the Vinaya not to become overly mechanical while still maintaining seriousness.

Main Content

In Dutiyaaniyata, the Buddha deals with the second case of actions whose degree of offense has not yet been clearly determined. Although the descriptive information provided does not give the specific content of this rule in detail, according to the general structure of the Aniyata section, such offenses usually concern suspicious or unclear actions, for example contact or conversation by a nun with a male layperson in circumstances that were not witnessed or did not have clear witnesses.

This second rule usually differs from the first rule in some respect, perhaps involving the degree of contact, the number of people involved, or the specific context. Theravāda Buddhism emphasizes that an action is judged not only by its outward appearance, but also by intention (cetanā). This is why Aniyata offenses require the Sangha to investigate carefully, question witnesses, and consider the full context before deciding the degree of penalty, from declaring the fault before the Sangha to separation or even requiring the person to leave monastic life.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.