Xct Mu Bu Pm Np 2Staying Apart From Robes
Pāli / Sanskrit:Udosita
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Udosita Discourse: Explanation on Being Separated From Robes
Background
The Udosita discourse is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, specifically in the Pācittiya section (offenses that a practitioner must confess). The background from which this discourse arose is connected with the story of monks who did not observe the rules concerning robes (cīvara), one of the essential factors of the renunciant practice in the Theravāda tradition.
The robe is not merely ordinary clothing, but a symbol of renunciation, of abandoning worldly pleasures in order to commit oneself to the Dharma. Keeping the robe properly is an important part of maintaining the discipline of the Sangha and expressing respect for the Buddha-Dharma. Therefore, the rules related to robes are recorded in detail in the Vinaya Piṭaka.
The Udosita discourse discusses the situation in which a monk becomes separated from his robe, that is, does not carry it with him or does not keep it according to the rule. This is considered conduct that needs to be corrected, because it reflects negligence in personal discipline and may negatively affect the unity and integrity of the Sangha.
Main Content
According to the context of the Vinaya Piṭaka, the Udosita discourse addresses the principle that a monk may not be completely separated from his robe for a long time. "Separated" (udosita) here means leaving the robe in another place, not carrying it, or intending no longer to use it.
The rule states that when a monk wishes to be separated from his robe, for whatever reason, he must inform another monk or have a witness. If that monk keeps his robe separate for too long without a legitimate reason or notification, this constitutes a pācittiya offense.
Specifically, this discourse emphasizes that the robe must be kept properly. If the monk deliberately leaves it behind without the consent of the Sangha or without informing anyone, that is a violation requiring confession before the Sangha.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.