Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bi Np 25Exchanging Personal Property

Pāli / Sanskrit:Puggalikacetāpana

📖310 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Exposition of the Rule on Exchanging Personal Property

Puggalikacetāpana — Vinaya Piṭaka

Background

The Rule on Exchanging Personal Property (Puggalikacetāpana) is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, in the Nidāna section of the early Buddhist tradition. This is the disciplinary section regulating the communal life of monks and nuns, especially in relation to handling property and transactions among members of the Sangha.

The background for this rule arose from specific events in the early monastic community. As the Buddha and his disciples practiced and traveled in many places, practical issues concerning personal property, the exchange of requisites, and the management of the possessions of bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs gradually arose. To maintain discipline and avoid disputes and conflict, the Buddha set forth clear principles.

This rule belongs to the field of Vinaya, the disciplinary collection, one of the Three Baskets of the Pāli Canon. Vinaya is not a set of arbitrary rules, but guidance for preserving one’s precepts and supporting the practice of concentration (samādhi) and wisdom (paññā).

Main Content

The Puggalikacetāpana rule focuses on the issue of exchanging or changing the ownership of personal requisites among bhikkhus. Apart from the basic requisites permitted by the Sangha, such as robes, water vessels, water strainers, and seats, each monastic has particular personal belongings that are recognized.

The rule clearly sets out the legal rights of individuals over property and the conditions under which exchange may take place without violating the discipline. If one bhikkhu wishes to exchange his item with another bhikkhu, both parties must have clear consent. There must be no coercion, deception, or taking advantage of another’s vulnerable situation in order to seize property.

In addition, the rule points out that improper transactions, such as exchanges under the influence of greed, hatred, or delusion, or with the purpose of harming the Sangha, are all regarded as violations.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.