San Sarv Bu Pm Tf 11 Pc 9Criticizing Robe Distribution
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
THE DISCOURSE CRITICIZING ROBE DISTRIBUTION (Dubbala Sutta)
Context
The Dubbala discourse, concerning criticism of robe distribution, is recorded in the early Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pātimokkha Rules, the basic ethical regulations of the Buddhist Sangha. The context of the discourse arises from conflicts among bhikkhus during the distribution of robes, the common property of the monastic community.
During the lifetime of the Buddha, the Sangha lived mainly on basic requisites: alms food offered by lay followers and robes donated ceremonially. These robes, considered communal property of the Sangha, needed to be distributed fairly and honestly. However, some bhikkhus became involved in objections, criticism, or disorder during this distribution process, causing discord within the community.
The Dubbala discourse is recorded as a warning and guidance on how to handle such disputes, in order to maintain the Vinaya, the discipline, and the spirit of Sangha harmony.
Main Content
According to the Theravāda Pāli Canon tradition, this discourse concerns Pātimokkha Rule 9, or Rule 11 in some versions, especially within the Pācittiya class, rules requiring practice with attention and caution. The core content concerns the act of "objecting" (dubbala ditthi) to the way communal property is distributed, especially robes supplied to the Sangha.
The discourse makes clear that when bhikkhus take part in the process of robe distribution through steps such as collecting, sharing, or allocating robes to individuals, they should do so with honest awareness (sammā), without objection or disturbance. If a bhikkhu objects, criticizes, or tries to change a decision already agreed upon by the Sangha, this is considered a violation of the discipline.
Specifically, "objecting" may include making unnecessary criticism about the manner of distribution, provoking disputes, or attempting to exploit the distribution system for personal benefit.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.