Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit

San Sarv Bu Pm Tf 11 Pc 35Encouraging Another Monastic to Eat More After Refusing an Invitation

Pāli / Sanskrit:Dutiyapavāraṇā

📖307 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the Dutiyapavāraṇā Sutta

Encouraging Another Practitioner to Eat More After Refusing an Invitation

Context

Dutiyapavāraṇā is a prohibition (Pācittiya) in the Theravāda Vinaya tradition, found in the Bhikkhunī Vibhaṅga—the section of discipline prescribed for women renunciants. This sutta was stated when the Buddha recognized that the community of bhikkhunīs needed clear guidance regarding rules for eating and self-restraint in virtue.

The context arose when some women renunciants did not observe the practice concerning food. In the Theravāda tradition, eating is not merely a material matter but is deeply related to mindfulness (sati) and restraint of the faculties (indriya-saṃvara). This prohibition reflects the balance between self-control and cooperation in the community of practice.

Main Content

The Dutiyapavāraṇā Sutta addresses the following situation: When a bhikkhunī refuses an invitation to eat from a householder or from other members of the community, another bhikkhunī tries to persuade her companion to eat more. This act of encouragement, especially if done with the intention of influencing the other’s self-control or observance of the discipline, is considered a Pācittiya offense.

Pācittiya offenses are prohibitions requiring confession before a witness. They are lighter than pārājika, the grave prohibitions leading to expulsion, but they still require monastics to practice carefully. This prohibition does not completely forbid encouraging a friend to eat, but emphasizes that intention and context are important. If the motivation is to help another maintain sufficient health for practice, that is different. However, if the purpose is to entice another into violating a regulation or weakening self-restraint, that is a violation.

The deeper reason for this rule lies in the recognition that self-control (dama) in eating is the seed of self-control in all aspects of practice. When a monastic cannot regulate what they eat, this tends to create a weak foundation for the entire path of practice.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản diễn giải AI · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.