San Sarv Bu Pm Finot Pc 54Obstructing a Legal Procedure
Pāli / Sanskrit:Kammapaṭibāhana
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
KAMMAPAṬIBĀHANA DISCOURSE: OBSTRUCTING A DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
Background
The Kammapaṭibāhana Discourse (Obstructing a Disciplinary Procedure) is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pātimokkha section, the collection of basic rules of practice that monks and nuns must observe. This discourse belongs to the Pācittiya category, offences requiring confession, and reflects real situations that arose in the early community of practice.
The context of the discourse concerns disciplinary cases in the Sangha. When a member commits an offence, the Sangha undertakes a formal procedure called "kamma" (act, action) to examine and impose discipline. This is an important mechanism for maintaining order, protecting the Dharma, and preserving the purity of the community of practice.
The Kammapaṭibāhana Discourse addresses acts that obstruct or hinder this procedure: acts worthy of objection, undermining consensus, or deliberately interfering with the decision of the Sangha while it is carrying out disciplinary action. This is regarded as a punishable violation.
Main Content
According to the rule in the Pātimokkha, obstructing a lawful disciplinary procedure of the Sangha is considered a Pācittiya offence. The detailed content includes actions such as:
First, undermining the unity (samaggi) of the Sangha by raising illegitimate arguments while the disciplinary procedure is taking place. This includes deliberately introducing secondary issues, diverting the topic, or distorting the truth.
Second, stubbornly opposing a decision of the Sangha on baseless grounds, when the adjudication has been completed according to proper procedure. The Khandhaka, the practical guidebooks, explain clearly that only defilements of ignorance and anger are the true motives behind such conduct.
Third, deliberately acting to cause disorder, such as creating further conflict, calling on other members not to obey the decision, or declaring the procedure unlawful without evidence.
This rule was established to protect the integrity of the disciplinary adjudication process.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.