San Sarv Bu Pm Finot Pc 34Eating More After Refusing an Invitation
Pāli / Sanskrit:Pavāraṇā
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Pavāraṇā Sutta: Authentic Practice in Refusal
Background
Pavāraṇā (Pāli: "refusal, declining") is a rule found within the Pātimokkha—the list of precepts that monks and nuns are required to observe. This text records a specific situation in the life of the early Sangha, when the disciples of the Buddha encountered material advantages and needed to maintain purity in their conduct around eating.
In the period of Early Buddhism, monks lived by means of alms-round—going from house to house to receive food. Lay people would often request permission from individual monks one at a time, or even after a monk had already declined, would still deliberately continue to offer invitations or prepare additional food. This presented a difficult situation, for on one hand there was the mindful refusal to avoid greed, and on the other hand there was respect for the generosity and goodwill of the lay person.
Main Content
The Pavāraṇā Sutta addresses a specific paccaya (conditioning factor): a monk should clearly decline an invitation to eat on one occasion—not out of arrogance or discourtesy, but in order to safeguard the purity of the mind. However, after refusing, if the lay person continues to make further efforts to encourage or to prepare additional food, the monk should not accept that portion of food. If a monk accepts additional food after having already declined, that constitutes an improper act.
The key point here is consistency and truthfulness in one's words. When a monk says "no," that must carry genuine meaning. It is not a perfunctory refusal made merely for appearances, nor a waiting for the opportunity to change one's decision when something more advantageous presents itself. This is a lesson in ethical integrity (sīla) and the restraint of the faculties (indriya-samvara).
This rule also safeguards the vulnerable mind of the practitioner, for attachment to material things—even food—will erode one's inner composure, meditative stability, and mental tranquility.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.