Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit

Mpt Pj 3Murder

Pāli / Sanskrit:Manussaviggaha

📖326 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the Manussaviggaha Discourse (Killing a Human Being)

From the Traditional Theravāda Vinaya Pitaka

Background

The Manussaviggaha Discourse (Pāli: Manussaviggaha, meaning “attacking/killing a human being”) belongs to the Pāṭimokkha Samvara Vibhaṅga, the section explaining the disciplinary rules for monks and nuns in the Vinaya Pitaka. This is not a sermon discourse, but a detailed normative text concerning offenses connected with the killing of living beings, especially human beings.

In the context of the early Sangha, these rules were established to protect the moral conduct of novices, monks, and nuns, and to educate people about the precepts. The discourse does not merely state a prohibition, but explains in detail the cases, motivations, methods, and consequences of killing, so that practitioners may deeply understand the ethical nature of attacking life.

Main Content

Manussaviggaha focuses on the legal category “Pārājikā,” a defeat offense, one of the most serious violations in the Patimokkha. Specifically, the discourse states that if a monk or bhikkhunī intentionally kills a human being (manussassa jīvitā voropeti), or instructs another person to kill, or praises another person’s death, that person commits a Pārājikā offense, meaning they no longer have the status of a member of the Sangha.

The discourse presents in detail the conditions for a violation: the intention must be clear (cetanā), the action must be carried out or instructed, and the victim must be a living human being. It also distinguishes levels of violation, from attempting to kill to praising death, with each case having different ethical consequences.

A noteworthy point is that the discourse considers not only the physical action but also emphasizes the role of intention (cetanā) and the spirit of the act. An act of killing is not regarded as “accidental” if there has been mental preparation, prior thought, or open execution.

Practical Meaning

Although Manussaviggaha is a normative text intended specifically for those gone forth, its teaching has profound value for all Buddhist practitioners.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.