Mpt Np 27Haste-Cloth

Haste-Cloth — Accekacīvara

Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit | Mpt Np 27
AI Explanation — Inti Dharma

---

Source Status

This scriptural item belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit, bearing the identifier Mpt Np 27, with the name Accekacīvara (Haste-Cloth). It is a training rule within the Vinaya system of the sectarian traditions, preserved in Sanskrit form and included in the project comparing parallel Vinaya sources.

The full Sanskrit source text of this training rule has not yet been fully compared in the database being used. Therefore, the explanation below is not a translation of the original scripture, but a presentation based on the current descriptive information combined with general knowledge of the position and nature of the rule within sectarian Vinaya systems. Readers should bear this in mind when referring to it for research or practice.

---

Background

In the Vinaya systems of the sectarian traditions, training rules related to the robes (cīvara) of bhikkhus occupy an important place, expressing the early community’s deep concern with subduing craving, cultivating fewness of wishes and contentment, and maintaining the dignity of renunciation.

The group of rules marked Np (Nissaggiya Pācittiya, or an equivalent in the sectarian tradition) concerns forfeiture and confession, that is, offenses requiring a bhikkhu to return the item and perform confession before the Sangha. These are lighter offenses than Pārājika or Saṅghādisesa, but still require formal handling in order to preserve the purity of the precept body.

Training rule number 27 in this group, called Accekacīvara, literally “urgent robe” or “haste-cloth,” refers to a special case concerning the receiving and keeping of robes outside the ordinary time prescribed in the Vinaya.

---

Content Identifiable from the Descriptive Information

The term accekacīvara (Sanskrit: ātikālikacīvara or an equivalent form) denotes a robe offered outside the normal season, specifically when a donor has an urgent reason, such as preparing to travel, serious illness, or circumstances that do not permit waiting until the official robe-offering season, such as Kaṭhina or the end of the rains retreat. The word “haste” in the English title clarifies the nature of the situation: the urgency comes from the donor, not from the bhikkhu.

This training rule regulates whether a bhikkhu is permitted to receive this special kind of robe, when he may receive it, and how long he may keep it. Vinaya texts in many sectarian traditions record that, even when a donor has an urgent need to make an offering, the bhikkhu must still follow the proper procedure for receiving robes, must not keep the robe beyond the allowed period, and if he keeps it beyond that period, he must forfeit it and confess.

In the context of sectarian comparison, the training rule Accekacīvara appears in many different Vinaya traditions with similar content, reflecting a fundamental unity in the principle of managing requisites among the schools, even where there are differences in wording or expression.

---

Meaning for Practice

The training rule Accekacīvara contains several layers of deep meaning for practitioners:

First, it expresses the principle of fewness of wishes and contentment: one who has gone forth does not accumulate robes beyond what is necessary, even when the item is offered with wholesome intention. The limit on the time for keeping the robe is precisely a way in which the Vinaya protects the mind from greed.

Second, the rule emphasizes the responsibility of the bhikkhu in guiding donors. When a donor needs to offer a robe urgently, the bhikkhu has the responsibility to receive it properly according to the Dharma, neither rejecting the donor’s wholesome intention nor taking advantage of the occasion to accumulate beyond the rule.

Third, through this training rule, the spirit that the Vinaya is a framework supporting practice, not a legal burden, becomes clear. Regulations concerning robes help bhikkhus maintain simplicity in material life and thereby nourish a mind directed toward liberation.

Fourth, the context of sectarian comparison reminds us that the core spirit of the Vinaya goes beyond the boundaries of any single tradition. Although Sanskrit, Pāli, and Chinese texts may differ in certain details, the schools agree on the basic principle: a bhikkhu should live simply, purely, and handle requisites in accordance with the Dharma and Vinaya.

---

Comparative Note

Because the full Sanskrit source text of training rule Mpt Np 27 has not yet been directly compared in the current database, this explanation reflects only what can be identified from the descriptive information provided, including the name, sequence number within the group, and etymological meaning of the term Accekacīvara. Researchers wishing to compare the detailed content need direct access to the original Sanskrit text or specialized bilingual editions within the Sectarian Comparative Vinaya project.