Bu Np 2828. Storing haste-cloth too long
Pāli / Sanskrit:Accekacīvara
A monk who stores “an urgent robe” beyond the acceptable time limit must relinquish it and confess the offense.
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Theravāda Collection on Monastic Law The Great Analysis
The chapter on relinquishment The subchapter on almsbowls 28. Storing haste-cloth too long
Origin story
At one time when the Buddha was staying at Sāvatthī in Anāthapiṇḍika’s Monastery, a government official who was about to set out on a journey sent a message to the monks, saying, “Come, venerables, I wish to give robe-cloth to those who have completed the rainy-season residence.”
The monks thought, “The Buddha has allowed such robes only for those who have completed the rains residence,” and being afraid of wrongdoing they did not go. That government official complained and criticized them, “How could they not come when I send a message? I’m about to set out with the army. It’s hard to know whether I’ll live or die.”
The monks heard the complaints of that government official, and they told the Buddha. Soon afterwards the Buddha gave a teaching and addressed the monks:
“Monks, I allow you to receive a haste-cloth, and then store it.”
When they heard about this, monks received haste-cloths and stored them beyond the robe season, keeping them in bundles on a bamboo robe rack.
While walking about the dwellings, Venerable Ānanda saw those cloths, and he asked the monks, “Whose cloths are these?”
“They’re our haste-cloths.”
“But how long have you stored them?”
They told him. Ānanda then complained and criticized them, “How could these monks receive haste-cloths and then store them beyond the robe season?”
After rebuking those monks in many ways, Ānanda told the Buddha. Soon afterwards he had the Sangha gathered and questioned the monks: “Is it true, monks, that there are monks who do this?”
“It’s true, sir.”
The Buddha rebuked them … “How could those foolish men do this? This will affect people’s confidence …” … “And, monks, this training rule should be recited like this:
Final ruling
‘When there are ten days left to the Kattika full moon that ends the first rainy-season residence and a haste-cloth is given to a monk, he may receive it if he regards it as urgent. He may then store it until the end of the robe season. If he stores it beyond that, he commits an offense entailing relinquishment and confession.’”
Definitions
There are ten days left: the invitation ceremony is ten days in the future. The Kattika full moon that ends the first rainy-season residence: the Kattika full moon of the invitation ceremony is what is meant. Haste-cloth: when someone intends to set out with the army, when someone intends to set out on a journey, when someone is sick, when someone is pregnant, when someone without faith acquires faith, when someone without confidence acquires confidence—if that person sends a message to the monks, saying, “Come, venerables, I wish to give a robe to those who have completed the rainy-season residence,” this is called “haste-cloth”.
He may receive it if he regards it as urgent. He may then store it until the end of the robe season: establishing the perception of it as a haste-cloth, he may store it. The robe season: for one who has not participated in the robe-making ceremony, it is the last month of the rainy season; for one who has participated in the robe-making ceremony, it is the five month period.
If he stores it beyond that: for one who has not participated in the robe-making ceremony, if he stores it beyond the last day of the rainy season, he commits an offense entailing relinquishment and confession. For one who has participated in the robe-making ceremony, if he stores it beyond the day on which the robe season ends, the cloth becomes subject to relinquishment.
The cloth should be relinquished to a sangha, a group, or an individual. “And, monks, it should be relinquished like this. …” (To be expanded as in Bu NP 1:3.2.5–3.2.29, with appropriate substitutions.)
“Venerables, this haste-cloth, which I have stored beyond the robe season, is to be relinquished. I relinquish it to the Sangha.” … “the Sangha should give …” “you should give …” “I give this cloth back to you.”
Permutations
If it is a haste-cloth and he perceives it as such, and he stores it beyond the robe season, he commits an offense entailing relinquishment and confession. If it is a haste-cloth, but he is unsure of it, and he stores it beyond the robe season, he commits an offense entailing relinquishment and confession. If it is a haste-cloth, but he does not perceive it as such, and he stores it beyond the robe season, he commits an offense entailing relinquishment and confession.
If it has not been determined, but he perceives that it has … If it has not been assigned to another, but he perceives that it has … If it has not been given away, but he perceives that it has … If it has not been lost, but he perceives that it has … If it has not been destroyed, but he perceives that it has … If it has not been burned, but he perceives that it has … If it has not been stolen, but he perceives that it has, and he stores it beyond the robe season, he commits an offense entailing relinquishment and confession.
If he uses cloth that should be relinquished without first relinquishing it, he commits an offense of wrong conduct. If it is not a haste-cloth, but he perceives it as such, he commits an offense of wrong conduct. If it is not a haste-cloth, but he is unsure of it, he commits an offense of wrong conduct. If it is not a haste-cloth and he does not perceive it as such, there is no offense.
Non-offenses
There is no offense: if within the robe season the haste-cloth has been determined, assigned to another, given away, lost, destroyed, burned, stolen, or taken on trust; if he is insane; if he is the first offender.
The training rule on storing haste-cloth too long, the eighth, is finished.
The “…” is an abbreviation carried over from the Pāli original itself, called peyyāla. The early canon was memorized and recited, so passages repeated verbatim from a preceding discourse were commonly contracted to an elision mark rather than written out in full. Venerable Thích Minh Châu's translation preserves this convention. Some texts therefore look short — but that is the canonical form, not missing content or a truncated translation. The elided passages can be read in full in the preceding discourses of the same chapter.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.