Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit

San Mu Bu Pm GBM 3 Np 11Silk Blanket

Pāli / Sanskrit:Kosiya

📖289 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Kosiya Sutta - The Silk Blanket

Background

The Kosiya Sutta belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka, the disciplinary section of the early Buddhist Sangha. This discourse is recorded among the prohibitions for monks and nuns, specifically in the section on Nissaggiya Pācittiya, offenses requiring forfeiture of the item and confession.

The context in which the discourse appears concerns nuns in the monastic community while the Buddha was still alive. Some nuns used precious items, specifically a silk blanket (kosiya), beyond the minimum regulations permitted in the monastery. This gave rise to disputes and breaches of discipline, causing the Buddha to establish clear rules in order to maintain the purity and simplicity of moral life.

Silk (kosiya) is a precious fabric that could be possessed only by the wealthy. For a monastic to possess or use silk improperly goes directly against the spirit of going forth: renouncing material pleasures and cultivating simplicity (appicchataṃ).

Main Content

The Kosiya Sutta prescribes that nuns are not permitted to possess or use silk blankets. If a nun receives a silk blanket from a donor or from any other source, she must relinquish it immediately. Deliberately keeping the silk blanket is regarded as a Nissaggiya Pācittiya offense, a kind of violation requiring the monastic to declare the offense before a person of Dharma conduct, relinquish the forbidden item, and confess.

This rule is not merely a prohibition, but also reflects the design principle of the Vinaya Piṭaka: establishing clear boundaries between monastic life and the wealthy household life. Items such as silk, gold and silver, perfumes, or cosmetics are all regarded as "implements of worldly entanglement" (sekha-bhavana), things that easily arouse ambition and dependence.

This rule is not personal or discriminatory in nature.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.