San Lo Bu Pm Pc 83Needle Cases
Pāli / Sanskrit:Sūcighara
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Needle Case Discourse (Sūcighara)
Background
The Needle Case Discourse (Sūcighara) is a rule in the Pacittiya section, offenses requiring confession, of the Vinaya Pitaka in the Theravāda Buddhist tradition. The Vinaya records the rules of life for bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs, laid down by the Buddha on the basis of specific situations that arose in the Sangha.
This discourse arose from an event in monastic life during the Buddha’s time. When bhikkhus needed to keep small items such as needles (sūci, needles used for sewing robes, undergarments, or other daily needs), they needed a safe place for storage. However, this practice led to conflicts or weaknesses in the management of common property of the Sangha. This event prompted the Buddha to issue a rule regulating conduct related to needle cases and the question of personal property in the monastic community.
Main Content
The rule concerning needle cases reminds bhikkhus that personal articles should not be lost or taken through careless management. In the Theravāda tradition, bhikkhus are permitted to possess certain necessary items for practice and daily life, things called “Parisuddha bhoga” (pure requisites). However, possession does not mean complete freedom to manage them according to one’s own wishes.
The discourse states clearly that if a bhikkhu allows his belongings, such as a needle case, to be lost through negligence, or does not observe the proper method of storage according to Sangha regulations, he commits a Pacittiya (pācittiya) offense, an offense requiring confession before the Sangha or before other bhikkhus. This is not the gravest offense, but it reflects a lack of carefulness (appamāda) in action.
The key point is that the Buddha wanted his disciples to practice diligence not only in meditation and study of the Dharma, but also in managing material necessities wisely and responsibly.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.