San Lo Bi Vb Sk 36Aṅgulinillehaka
Pāli / Sanskrit:Aṅgulinillehaka
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Aṅgulinillehaka — AI Exposition (Inti Dharma)
> Note: This is a scholarly exposition prepared by AI on the basis of existing descriptive information, not a translation of the original sutta. The full source text has not been directly collated.
---
Source Status
The sutta item bearing the designation San Lo Bi Vb Sk 36 belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit corpus in the tradition of Sectarian Canons · Comparative. The title is recorded consistently in all three comparison languages as Aṅgulinillehaka, indicating that this is a technical term, the title of a training rule, preserved in its Pāli/Sanskrit form without divergent translation across traditions.
However, the full Sanskrit source text of this provision has not yet been fully collated in the Inti Dharma database. The supplied descriptive information is limited to the title and classification location. Therefore, this exposition can only present a general account based on the name, its position in the Vinaya collection, and common scholarly knowledge of the genre of comparative sectarian Vinaya texts.
---
Background
The Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit collection is a scholarly project intended to gather and compare Vinaya Piṭaka provisions from various Buddhist schools, especially through surviving Sanskrit texts — including materials from the Mūlasarvāstivāda, Sarvāstivāda, and related traditions. The comparative approach allows scholars to see similarities and differences in the process by which disciplinary rules were systematized in different Sangha communities.
The designation Vb Sk 36 suggests that this training rule belongs to the group of Śaikṣa-dharma (Sanskrit: Śikkhāpada, Pāli: Sekhiya) — that is, the group of training rules concerning deportment and conduct in the everyday life of those gone forth. This is one of the groups of rules concerned with behavior and ritual propriety, regulating ways of eating, walking, standing, communicating, and bodily gestures within the Sangha community and before laypeople.
---
Content Identifiable from the Descriptive Information
The title Aṅgulinillehaka may be analyzed according to Pāli/Sanskrit roots as follows:
- Aṅguli (aṅgula): finger
- Nillehaka (from the root lehati / lihati): to lick, to lick clean, the act of touching with the tongue
Together, Aṅgulinillehaka literally means “licking the fingers” — specifically, the act of licking the fingers while eating.
In the Vinaya context, this is usually a training rule belonging to the Sekhiya/Śaikṣa group, prescribing that one gone forth should not lick the fingers while eating, because this action is regarded as lacking deportment, unworthy of the dignity of a monastic, and capable of creating a sense of impurity or lack of refinement before donors.
The provision numbered 36 in the sequence of Śaikṣa training rules shows that this is one in a series of training rules arranged by subject group, very likely belonging to the group of training rules related to the manner of eating (bhaṭṭa-sekhiya or bhojana-sekhiya) — an important group in the Vinaya traditions of the schools, regulating in detail each gesture of body and speech while eating in order to preserve the deportment of one gone forth.
---
Meaning for Practice
Although this provision may sound purely formal, its practical meaning is deeper than the surface. In the Buddhist tradition, deportment (ācāra, iriyāpatha) is not simply social politeness, but the outward expression of the inner state of mind. A monastic who eats with mindfulness, not carried away by craving for food, always aware of the body and the body’s actions — this reflects genuine practice of mindfulness of the body (kāyagatāsati) and contentment (santuṭṭhi).
The act of licking the fingers symbolizes attachment to taste, being led by the flavor of food to the point of forgetting wakefulness. One gone forth is encouraged to receive food with the attitude of a physician taking medicine — not for the satisfaction of sensual pleasure, but to maintain the body in order to continue practicing the path.
Furthermore, in receiving offerings from the faithful, one gone forth bears the responsibility of protecting the donors’ faith. A gesture lacking deportment may diminish their confidence in the Sangha, and thereby indirectly obstruct the merit of the giver. Thus the Sekhiya/Śaikṣa training rules should not be regarded as empty formalities, but as subtle teachings on the relationship between bodily-verbal conduct and spiritual development.
---
Comparative Note
Because the Sanskrit text of the item San Lo Bi Vb Sk 36 has not been directly collated in the present database, researchers who wish to study further should consult surviving Sanskrit Vinaya texts from the corresponding schools, as well as Chinese Vinaya translations that may contain equivalent provisions, in order to compare the wording and scope of this training rule across different traditions.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.