Lzh Sarv Bu Vb Pc 63Tickling
Pāli / Sanskrit:Aṅgulipatodaka
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of the Aṅgulipatodaka Discourse (Tickling)
Background
The Aṅgulipatodaka discourse is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, specifically in the Pācittiya section, offenses requiring confession. During the Buddha’s lifetime, the community of monks and nuns continued to grow, leading to issues of discipline and communal ethics that needed clarification. This discourse reflects a specific situation that occurred in the monastic community concerning improper behavior.
The word Aṅgulipatodaka (poking with a finger, or tickling) refers to a very specific action, using a finger either to remove a thorn or simply to poke and tease, disturbing another person. Although this act may seem minor, in the monastery context it reflects lack of respect, lack of composure, and may cause disruption to the environment of practice.
Main Content
According to the Pāli Vinaya Piṭaka, tickling or teasing another person with a finger is considered a Pācittiya offense, Pātimokkha 63, that is, a lighter offense but one still requiring confession before the Sangha or before a monk. This rule does not completely forbid touching another person, but forbids actions done in jest, to tease, or to disturb and break the concentration of one engaged in practice.
This rule applies mainly to bhikkhus, male monastics. It reflects a basic principle in the Buddha Dharma: respect for the body and mind of another. Though seemingly harmless, in the monastery context, where everyone is committed to preserving composure and focusing on practice, such an act becomes a deliberate disruption and is therefore considered a violation.
The reason for this rule lies in the spirit of vigilance toward “small actions” that may lead to greater ones. According to Buddhist thought, even a small action done without heedfulness can undermine one’s own composure and that of others, thereby obstructing the path of practice.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.