Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bi Pm Pc 131Moving Robes

Pāli / Sanskrit:Saṅghāṭicāra

📖961 words · ~4 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Source Status

This section is based only on the provided descriptive information and the truncated ending of the Vietnamese text. There has been no direct comparison with the full text at the source link, so the complete original rule, the origin story of the rule, the specific object of application, or the classification in the Vinaya tradition cannot be asserted. This is an AI interpretation in Vietnamese, not a translation of the original Vinaya text.

The descriptive information states that this item is numbered Lzh Sarv Bi Pm Pc 131, belonging to “Sectarian Buddhist Texts · Comparative” and “Comparative Vinaya — Chinese.” The Vietnamese title is “Di Chuyển Y,” the English title is “Moving Robes,” and the Pali title is “Saṅghāṭicāra.” The truncated ending speaks about keeping the outer robe or robe properly upon the body, not letting it slip, drag, or fall down while walking, bending, or engaging in activities. Nevertheless, those descriptions belong to the truncated passage and may be interpretive; caution is needed before considering them original content.

Context

In monastic life, robes are not merely clothing for covering the body. The robe signifies the life of renunciation, simplicity, belonging to the community of practice, and the limits that the practitioner willingly places upon oneself. The way one wears the robe therefore has moral and educational meaning: a practitioner does not use the robe for display, nor does one treat it lightly as an ordinary object. Keeping the robe orderly is a way of keeping the mind orderly.

The title “Moving Robes” suggests a rule related to the displacement of the robe while the body is moving. If someone wears the robe carelessly, allowing it to slip from the body, get in the way, drag, or fall, this may express a lack of attention. In the monastic environment, such details are not regarded as trivial because they affect the dignity of the community as a whole. One individual’s lack of decorum does not affect only that person’s own image, but also the confidence of others in the holy life.

Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information

From the descriptive information, the theme can be identified as robes, especially the act of “moving robes” or “Saṅghāṭicāra.” The technical details of the rule should not be asserted without the full text. However, based on the title and the ending, one may cautiously interpret that this item is concerned with the robe being inappropriately displaced while a monastic is engaged in activity.

The ending emphasizes that the spirit of the rule is not formal fussiness, but respect for the Dharma, respect for the community, and respect for the monastic way of life itself. This can be retained as the main interpretive direction. In Vinaya training, dignity does not necessarily mean a stern outward appearance. Dignity is when bodily action, speech, and the use of requisites all contain clear knowing, without heedlessness or carelessness.

The robe of a practitioner can be regarded as a daily Dharma instrument. It reminds the wearer of a life of few wishes, contentment, and not chasing after worldly adornment. Therefore, keeping the robe from falling, dragging, or becoming disheveled may be understood as keeping the vow of living simply and mindfully. Seen only from outside, this rule may appear small. But seen from the process of training, it touches the ability to maintain mindfulness through the body’s continuous movements.

It is also necessary to distinguish between a fault due to heedlessness and displacement caused by unavoidable circumstances. The descriptive information does not provide exemptions or legal analysis, so no conclusion should be invented. It can only be said that, in the spirit of practice, one who keeps the robe properly is someone concerned with suitability, modesty, neatness, and avoiding obstruction to oneself or others.

Meaning for Practice

The lesson from the theme “Moving Robes” does not stop at clothing. It opens a way of seeing every requisite of practitioners and students of the path. A robe, a bowl, a scripture, a seat, a small room: all can be used in mindfulness or in distraction. When we know how to care for objects just enough, without attachment but also without carelessness, the mind is trained in balance.

For monastics, wearing the robe neatly is a form of reminding oneself of virtue. Before appearing before the community, entering a shared space, meeting laypeople, or carrying out daily work, adjusting the robe can become a moment of return. One asks oneself: is the body composed, is the mind hurried, is my intention clear? That question is more important than outward appearance, but the outward appearance can help bring the mind back.

For laypeople, this spirit can be applied to orderly and respectful living. Clothing, speech, a work desk, a place of worship, and the way one appears before others all reflect part of the inner mind. Practice does not demand elaborateness, but neither does it encourage carelessness. Simplicity has a different quality from disorder; contentment differs from disregard; non-attachment to form differs from the destruction of all standards.

Comparative Note

The original Chinese wording or the corresponding legal terms for “Saṅghāṭicāra” cannot yet be confirmed. Nor can it be determined what case this rule describes, what the degree of offense is, or what exceptions may exist. These points need to be checked in the full source text before being used as research material.

This interpretation retains only the scope certain from the data: the item belongs to the Chinese comparative Vinaya, speaks of “Moving Robes,” and the truncated ending develops the meaning of dignity, respect, and mindfulness in keeping the robe. Since the source has not been compared, readers should regard this as a cautious practical interpretation, not as a complete legal explanation.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.