Lzh Sarv Bi Pm Np 2Staying Apart From Robes
Pāli / Sanskrit:Udosita
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Udosita Discourse: On Being Separated from Robes
Background
The Udosita discourse (Pāli Udosita, meaning “separated” or “apart”) is part of the Vinaya Piṭaka in the Theravāda Buddhist tradition. This text belongs to Nepali Buddhist Texts (Sarv Bi Pm Np 2), recording regulations concerning the management of Sangha property and the legal conditions related to robes.
The robe is not merely ordinary cotton clothing, but a sacred symbol of going forth, representing the severing of worldly conditions. The Vinaya Piṭaka, or Vinaya, was compiled to maintain discipline in the Sangha, ensuring that bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs live purely, focused on practice and the teaching. Regulations concerning property, including robes, are all directed toward this purpose.
This discourse deals with a specific situation: when a robe is considered “separated” or no longer belonging to a bhikkhu, and what legal consequences follow from that. This is part of the Bhikkhu Pātimokkha, the basic code for male monastics.
Main Content
In accordance with the spirit of the Vinaya Piṭaka, the Udosita discourse stipulates that a robe is considered the private property of a bhikkhu only when it is “retained” (ussaṇṇa) or “held” through permitted means. Conversely, if a bhikkhu voluntarily gives up ownership, or if the robe is lost, destroyed, or separated from the management of that monastic, then it is no longer considered his property.
This is linked to the principle of possessing only those requisites necessary for practice: robe, bowl, belt, and water strainer. If a bhikkhu leaves a robe somewhere else and forgets to retrieve it, or actively gives the robe to another person without the intention of taking it back, then that robe is considered “udosita” (separated). At that point, the monastic cannot demand it back or make a complaint.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.