Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bi Pm Dh Np 10Trading With Money

Pāli / Sanskrit:Rūpiyasaṁvohāra

📖282 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Discourse on Trading with Money (Rupiyasamvohara)

Background

The Rupiyasamvohara Discourse lies within the Vinaya Pitaka of the Early Buddhist tradition and reflects early Buddhist legal guidance on financial conduct and economic transactions in the community of monks and nuns. This is the section in which the Buddha clearly regulated prohibitions related to money (rupiya) and trading activity (samvohara) for monastics.

In the historical context of the Buddha’s time, money had already become an official medium of exchange. However, bhikkhus and bhikkhunis were not permitted to deal directly with money or take part in profit-seeking trade. This comes from the basic principle of going forth, renouncing material desire and focusing on the practice of awakening. This text records specific situations in which bhikkhus violated this rule, as well as exceptions allowed by the Buddha.

Main Content

According to the Early Buddhist Vinaya tradition, Rupiyasamvohara states that bhikkhus are not permitted to receive money directly from others or personally engage in commercial transactions. Such action is considered a violation of parajika, a grave offense, or at least sanghadisesa, an offense requiring declaration before the Sangha.

The discourse records many cases of bhikkhus violating this rule: some traded robes, food, or other property for profit. Some even lent money in order to collect interest. Such actions are regarded as improper (miccha) because they violate the spirit of renunciation in the practice of the path.

However, the Buddha also recognized exceptional cases: a bhikkhu may receive money that another person voluntarily gives, provided he does not ask for it or solicit it, or a bhikkhu may authorize a layperson to manage monastery property. These regulations reflect a balance between practicality and ethical ideal.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.