Lzh Mi Bu Pm Pc 54Tickling
Pāli / Sanskrit:Aṅgulipatodaka
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Aṅgulipatodaka Discourse (The Discourse on Tickling with the Finger)
Background
In the Vinaya Pitaka of the Theravāda tradition, the Pātimokkha, the basic discipline of the bhikkhus, records rules of conduct intended to protect moral conduct and maintain harmony in the Sangha. The Aṅgulipatodaka discourse belongs to the Pācittiya class, offenses requiring confession, lighter than Saṅghādisesa offenses but still requiring the monastic to practice confession before a witness.
This background arose when the Buddha saw bhikkhus engaging in impolite actions, such as tickling one another with a finger or making gestures that caused discomfort in the monastic community. These actions, though not violations of the major rules, reflected a lack of respect and discipline within the community.
Main Content
The rule of Aṅgulipatodaka stipulates that a bhikkhu should not poke or annoy another bhikkhu with gestures such as poking with a finger, or with similar insulting actions. If a bhikkhu intends to cause discomfort and carries out this action, he commits a Pācittiya offense, a fault requiring formal confession.
This teaching is not merely about avoiding rude physical gestures. It reflects a profound principle in Buddhism: respect for the integrity and dignity of others. Every action, however small, carries meaning in the spirit of practice. Tickling or causing discomfort, even indirectly, arises from ill will or carelessness, two factors that the core of the Buddhadharma requires one to transform.
Practical Meaning
The discourse teaches us that Buddhist practice begins with the most subtle things. Not only grave offenses, but also small habits, indirect words, or disrespectful gestures must be disciplined. A Theravāda practitioner regards Pācittiya not as terrible offenses, but as reminders that help refine the mind.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.