Lzh Mi Bu Pm Np 20An Extra Almsbowl
Pāli / Sanskrit:Patta
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Sutta on an Extra Bowl - Patta
Background
This sutta is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, in the Disciplinary Code (Pātimokkha). The original Pāli title is Patta, a simple name meaning "bowl," an object small in appearance but full of meaning in the life of Buddhist monastics.
The Vinaya Piṭaka is the collection that records the teachings of the Buddha and the rules of practice that he established for the Sangha. Among these, the regulations concerning the almsbowl, or patta, are not minor matters, but reflect a deep philosophy of practice: steadfastness in minimal possessions, non-greed, and respect for communal discipline.
The Patta sutta specifically refers to the case of a bhikkhu possessing an extra bowl beyond the permitted number. This is a minor offense (dukkaṭa) in the Vinaya, but it leaves an important lesson about accumulation, reasonable limits, and the management of necessities in the life of practice.
Main Content
According to the record, the Buddha established that a bhikkhu is permitted to possess only one almsbowl. This bowl is considered one of the seven necessities for a bhikkhu: robe, bowl, carrying strap, knife, sandals, water filter, and sewing needle.
If a bhikkhu possesses an additional second bowl without a valid reason, such as the old one being broken and there not yet having been time to dispose of it properly, that is an offense. The Vinaya Piṭaka requires that this bhikkhu immediately give up the extra bowl.
This sutta does not speak only of a physical bowl. It expresses an important principle: appicchataṁ, fewness of wishes and contentment, is one of the noble qualities in Buddhism. Possessing only what is necessary to sustain the life of practice, not gathering, not storing up, is a way of practicing concentration and wisdom.
This rule also reflects respect for the common property of the Sangha, because anything beyond personal need is regarded as communal property, not the private possession of one person.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.