Lzh Mi Bu Pm As 5Admission

Admission (Paṭiññātakaraṇa)

---

Source Status

The full source text of this Vinaya entry has not been directly collated and accessed in the preparation of this explanation. What can be presented below is constructed entirely from the supplied descriptive information, including the sectarian tradition, collection name (Comparative Vinaya — Chinese), sutta number (Lzh Mi Bu Pm As 5), Vietnamese title (Admission), English title (Admission), and Pāli title (Paṭiññātakaraṇa). Researchers should refer directly to the original Chinese text of the corresponding sectarian tradition in order to obtain the accurate and complete full text. This explanation does not replace the original text and does not represent any official scripture translation.

---

Background

This entry belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Chinese, a collection with the character of comparison among Vinaya traditions of various Buddhist schools. The designation Lzh Mi Bu Pm As 5 suggests that this is the fifth item (As 5) in a group or section related to bhikkhus (Mi Bu may be an abbreviation of Bhikkhu or Mí bù in Chinese), under the subdivision Pm, likely related to procedures of judgment, adjudication, or handling disputes in the Sangha.

The term Paṭiññātakaraṇa in Pāli may be analyzed as follows: paṭiññā means "admission," "acknowledgment," or "confirmation"; karaṇa means "carrying out," "act," or "procedure." Taken together, the term indicates a procedure conducted on the basis of the concerned person’s admission, that is, a method for resolving a dispute or violation in the Sangha based on the accused person’s own acknowledgment of the act, without need for further investigation or external evidence.

In the Buddhist Vinaya tradition, there are many different methods for settling disputes (adhikaraṇasamatha), and admission is one of the important bases by which the Sangha may proceed with discipline or reconciliation in a proper and harmonious manner.

---

Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information

Based on the title Paṭiññātakaraṇa and its position in the Comparative Vinaya collection, the content of this entry likely refers to:

1. Definition and classification of admission: What constitutes a valid admission in the context of the Vinaya Piṭaka? What conditions must an admission fulfill in order for the Sangha to accept it as a basis for handling the matter?

2. Procedure for carrying it out: After a bhikkhu admits an offense, what steps does the Sangha take? This may include formal kammavācā procedures, assembly of the Sangha, public declaration, and the consent of the community.

3. Comparison among sectarian schools: Because this is a Comparative Vinaya collection, this entry may present how different schools, such as Theravāda, Dharmaguptaka, Mūlasarvāstivāda, or Mahāsāṃghika, approach the principle of Paṭiññātakaraṇa, pointing out similarities and differences in rules concerning admission.

4. Limits of admission: Not every admission leads to the same result. Depending on the nature of the offense, admission may lead to simple confession, or may require more complex procedures by the Sangha.

---

Meaning for Practice

The principle of Paṭiññātakaraṇa carries profound meaning in the Buddhist life of practice. Admission is not merely a legal procedure, but also an expression of truthfulness (sacca) and moral shame and moral dread (hirī-ottappa), two qualities praised by the Buddha as factors that protect the ethical life of the practitioner.

When a bhikkhu voluntarily admits his fault before the Sangha, that act expresses the relinquishment of conceit, submission to the body of discipline, and confidence in the process of purification through the monastic community. This is the foundation of the Prātimokṣa discipline, each monastic taking responsibility for his own conduct and courageously facing the Sangha’s process of handling the matter.

In the context of sectarian comparison, studying this entry also helps practitioners understand that although the schools may differ in legal details, the basic spirit of personal responsibility, transparency in the Sangha, and the role of truthfulness remains a unified value running throughout the Buddhist traditions.

---

Comparative Note

Because the full source text has not been directly collated, researchers should note the following points:

• The original Chinese text of the corresponding sectarian tradition should be consulted to verify the specific content.
• The designation As 5 shows that this is the fifth item in a sequence; the adjacent items (As 1-4 and As 6 onward) may provide important context for understanding this entry comprehensively.
• This explanation is entirely based on descriptive information and terminological analysis, and does not represent content verified from the original text.

Buddhist students, especially those interested in comparative Vinaya studies, are encouraged to approach the original texts and specialized research directly in order to gain a complete and accurate understanding of the topic Paṭiññātakaraṇa in each specific sectarian tradition.