Lzh Mg Bi Vb Pc 4Reopening a Legal Issue
Pāli / Sanskrit:Ukkoṭana
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Discourse on Reopening a Legal Issue (Ukkoṭana)
Background
The Ukkoṭana (Reopening a Legal Issue) belongs to the Pātimokkha Samvara — the disciplinary section of the Vinaya Piṭaka in the Theravāda tradition. It forms part of the monastic rules (Bhikkhupātimokkha), specifically within the category of Pācittiya — offences requiring a lighter form of confession and expiation.
The discourse was taught by the Buddha at Sāvatthī, when a dispute arose in the Sangha concerning matters of Vinaya. Certain bhikkhus intended to reopen legal decisions that had already been adjudicated by the community of monks, seeking an opportunity to overturn previous conclusions. This conduct reflected a disposition to search for loopholes for personal advantage and a failure to abide by the consensus of the community. The Buddha recognized this behavior as divisive and as demonstrating a lack of respect for the collective rule of the Sangha, and therefore established this regulation in order to maintain the harmony and order of the monastic community.
Main Content
Ukkoṭana means "to reopen" or "to contest" a legal matter that has already been settled. This rule prohibits bhikkhus from deliberately reopening disputes or legal decisions that the Sangha has adjudicated through formal procedures. Such action is regarded as a failure to respect the collective authority of the Sangha and as an attempt to undermine a consensus that has already been reached.
Specifically, if a bhikkhu wishes to challenge or request the reconsideration of a ruling already made by the Sangha — whether concerning discipline, the interpretation of Vinaya, or any other matter — without legitimate grounds or appropriate authority, that bhikkhu transgresses this rule. The conditions constituting a transgression include deliberate intention, the performance of the act, and the resulting effect of creating distrust or division within the Sangha.
Furthermore, the discourse implies that legal decisions, once adjudicated through formal assemblies of the Sangha, are binding in nature and should not be challenged in an arbitrary manner. This upholds the stability and efficacy of the Sangha's system of law.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.