Lzh Mg Bi Pm Pc 76Durbalāya kaṭhina
Pāli / Sanskrit:Durbalāya kaṭhina
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Durbalāya Kaṭhina: The Case of the Weak Nylon Robe
Background
This case is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, where the regulations governing the communal life of monks and nuns are preserved. The Durbalāya kaṭhina — or "the case of the weak nylon robe" — arose from a practical dispute concerning the material used in the robes of bhikkhus.
During the time of the Buddha, the monastic community would regularly receive cloth or material from lay supporters for the making of robes. The Kaṭhina robe (a single-piece robe offered at the conclusion of the rains retreat) is the traditional garment, conventionally made from cloth of a certain degree of durability. However, when some lay devotees brought thin and fragile fabric (durbalāya — from dura, cloth, and balāya, weak) as an offering, a dispute arose: could fabric of this kind be considered suitable for receiving and sewing into a robe according to the Kaṭhina ceremony?
This was not a question of mere preference, but touched upon a principle of monastic training — the careful balance between simplicity and respect for the devotional intention of those making offerings.
Main Content
According to the records of the Pāli Canon, the Buddha resolved this matter by acknowledging that weak fabric could still be used for sewing a Kaṭhina robe, provided it was regarded as a legitimate cloth and was practically usable.
Nevertheless, Theravāda Buddhism also emphasizes a deeper principle. The acceptance of cloth or any material object is not based on its material value, but on the intention of the donor and the appropriateness of the item to the recipient's practice. A bhikkhu may wear a robe made from thin fabric, yet what is essential is that he remain mindful of the impermanent and transient nature of all material forms.
This regulation likewise reflects the philosophy of the Vinaya Piṭaka: not to reject the good will of lay supporters, while still maintaining standards of practice. Fragile fabric may itself demonstrate that the lay supporter offered it without any intention of ostentation, and that the bhikkhu, in turn, harbors no excessive attachment to the quality of his requisites. This is the characteristic balance found within Theravāda Vinaya scholarship.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.