Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Ka Bu Pm Pc 74Digging the Earth

Pāli / Sanskrit:Pathavīkhaṇana

📖316 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Pathavīkhaṇana Rule (Digging the Earth)

Context

The Pathavīkhaṇana rule belongs to the Vinaya Pitaka of the Theravada tradition, specifically within the Patimokkha section on Pacittiya offenses. These are regulations concerning faulty actions that require confession, established by the Buddha, the Tathagata, to govern the monastery and protect the purity of the Sangha.

This rule arose from an incident in the early monastic community, when bhikkhus either unintentionally or deliberately dug the earth within the monastery grounds. Although this action may seem ordinary, it violated a basic principle: not harming the small living beings dwelling in the soil. The Buddha saw this lack of careful consideration and gave a teaching to correct the conduct, with the purpose of educating the monastic community in compassion and mindfulness.

Main Content

The rule provides that if a bhikkhu digs the earth or extracts soil without a proper reason, the action is considered a Pacittiya, a fault requiring confession and self-examination before the Sangha. This is not among the gravest offenses, such as Parajika or Sanghadisesa, but it still shows a lack of clear understanding in the conduct of practice.

The act of "digging the earth" includes various methods: digging by hand, using a tool to break up the ground, or creating holes in the earth. The purpose of this prohibition arises from the principle of ahimsa, non-harming, because soil contains countless minute organisms and insects that we cannot see with the naked eye. When we dig the earth carelessly, we may unintentionally kill these living forms.

However, the rule also recognizes exceptional cases. If there is an objective reason, such as constructing something essential for the monastery, preparing a residence for bhikkhus, or doing necessary work for the community, the action is not regarded as a violation. What matters is the motive (cetana) behind the action: whether it arises from compassion, careful consideration, and the common good.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.