Ka Bu Pm Ay 2Second Undetermined Offence
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dutiyaaniyata
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Sutra on the Second Undetermined Offense (Dutiyaaniyata)
Background
Dutiyaaniyata is the second part in the group of offenses whose nature had not been fully determined at the time the Buddha established the rule. This content belongs to the Vinaya Pitaka, the collection governing discipline in the Buddhist Sangha, applied to bhikkhus. Offenses of the “aniyata” type, undetermined offenses, were recorded when incidents occurred and the Buddha had not yet clearly specified the degree of penalty or nature of the fault in detail. This is an important part of establishing the ethical and disciplinary foundation of Sangha society.
According to the traditional Theravada Vinaya Pitaka, undetermined offenses often relate to unusual situations or cases disputed as to the nature of the wrongdoing. Dutiyaaniyata specifically concerns actions that are unclear as to whether they constitute a violation, or that may occur under special conditions requiring the Buddha to examine and determine them with understanding.
Main Content
The “second” section on undetermined offenses records a specific situation different from the cases already stated. Although the descriptive information does not provide full details about the specific event, according to the general structure of the Vinaya Pitaka, undetermined offenses often involve actions by bhikkhus in ambiguous circumstances or situations that allow several interpretations.
Offenses in the aniyata group commonly include actions related to purity (brahmacariya), such as interactions or actions with women in circumstances where it is unclear whether there is a violation. The Buddha, through wisdom and compassion, carefully examined these cases and determined specific standards so that bhikkhus could clearly understand the boundary between permitted action and violation.
When determining undetermined offenses, the Buddha generally relied on factors such as the intention (cetana) of the offender, the context of the action, and possible consequences. This reflects a legal system based not only on outward action, but also on mental intention and circumstance.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.