Bi Pc 107107. Destroying plants
Pāli / Sanskrit:Bhūtagāma
A nun who intentionally destroys vegetation must confess the offense.
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
107. Destroying Plants (Bhūtagāma)
Vinaya Piṭaka — Pāli Canon (Theravāda) | Bi Pc 107
---
Source Status
This is an AI-rendered interpretation compiled by Inti Dharma on the basis of available descriptive information. The full Pāli source text of this training rule has not been directly consulted in the course of preparation. Accordingly, specific details concerning the origin story, the Buddha's words in their original form, and the case analyses found in the root text are not reproduced here. This interpretation presents only the context, the meaning of terminology, and guidance for practice based on what the descriptive information provides.
---
Background
Training rule Bi Pc 107 belongs to the collection of Pācittiya rules for bhikkhunīs within the Pāli Vinaya Piṭaka. The Pācittiya rules govern offenses that are less grave than Pārājika or Saṅghādisesa violations, yet still require the offender to perform confession (desanā) before another bhikkhunī in order to clear the offense. This mechanism serves to maintain the purity of one's precepts and to cultivate a sense of responsibility within the monastic community.
The Pāli title of this rule is Bhūtagāma, in which bhūta means "being, living entity" and gāma means "village, collection, community." Together, bhūtagāma is commonly understood as "the community of living beings," and more specifically refers to plants and vegetation — those things regarded as possessing life according to early Buddhist thought. In numerous Theravāda texts, plants are considered a form of living being (jīva) at a rudimentary level, and deliberately destroying them without valid reason is regarded as an act lacking in compassion and unsuited to the character of one who has gone forth into the homeless life.
---
Content Determinable from Descriptive Information
According to the summary provided, the essential content of this training rule is:
A bhikkhunī who intentionally destroys plants must confess that offense.
The crucial term here is "intentionally" (sañcicca in Pāli). Volition is the indispensable condition for an act to constitute a Pācittiya offense. If the destruction occurs accidentally, without intention, the vinaya assessment of the consequences is ordinarily treated differently. This reflects an important principle in Buddhist thought: volition (cetanā) is the central factor in determining karma and culpability.
The object destroyed is defined as vegetation (bhūtagāma) — encompassing trees, grasses, seeds, shoots, and other plant forms. In the context of the Vinaya Piṭaka, this may include such acts as felling trees, pulling up grass, breaking off branches, or destroying seeds without a reason recognized as permissible by the rules. The mode of resolution is confession (pāṭidesanīya or desanā), that is, acknowledging the fault before one or more other bhikkhunīs. The act of confession is not merely a formal procedure but also a reaffirmation of one's commitment to the precepts and a pledge not to repeat the offense.
---
Significance for Practice
The training rule regarding the non-destruction of plants carries many layers of deep meaning for the life of practice:
First, the spirit of non-harm (ahiṃsā). Early Buddhism advocates refraining from causing harm to all forms of life, including those that many might regard as lowly or without sentience. Not destroying vegetation is a concrete expression of broad compassion — compassion that is not confined to human beings or animals but extends to the whole of the living world.
Second, cultivating mindfulness in daily activities. The monastic is reminded to be aware of the impact of each action upon the surrounding environment. A bhikkhunī going about her daily movements, activities, and work must keep her attention present so as to avoid causing unnecessary harm to plants, soil, and the living environment.
Third, the effect on the Saṅgha's image in the eyes of the laity. Those who have gone forth live in dependence on the support of the lay community. Conduct that harms the environment, or that damages another's crops or vegetation, erodes the trust and respect that society holds toward the Saṅgha. The Vinaya thus also serves the function of protecting the integrity of the monastic community and sustaining harmony between monastics and society.
Fourth, training in the virtue of restraint and contentment. Not destroying what there is no necessity to destroy is itself an expression of a life of few desires and knowing sufficiency — one of the foundational qualities of one who has gone forth.
---
Note on Comparison with Primary Sources
The full Pāli text of training rule Bi Pc 107 (Bhūtagāma) has not been directly consulted in this interpretation. Researchers wishing to study the matter more thoroughly should consult the Pāli Vinaya Piṭaka directly in order to read the complete origin story, the case analyses (vibhaṅga), and the exceptions set forth in the root text. This will allow for a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the scope, conditions, and vinaya consequences of this important training rule in the life of practice of bhikkhunīs.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.