Toh 4155Untitled
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Exposition of Scripture Toh 4155—The Tengyur Treatise Collection
Background
Toh 4155 belongs to the Treatise Collection (Abhidharmapitaka) of the Tengyur—a collection of commentaries and treatises containing profound analyses of the Buddhadharma within the Northern Tibetan Mahayana tradition. It is an indispensable part of the corpus of practice materials in Tibetan Buddhism, composed over many centuries by eminent masters of the Buddhadharma. The Tengyur Treatise Collection serves as a bridge between the original scriptures of the Kangyur and a profound understanding of the Dharma’s meaning.
Although the scripture’s title has not been translated, its Northern Tibetan context indicates that this text certainly addresses central Mahayana questions such as the nature of mind, the existence of sentient beings and Buddhas, or profound aspects of the doctrine of emptiness (śūnyatā). Such treatises were composed by Dharma masters such as Aryadeva, Candrakīrti, and Vasubandhu to help practitioners understand every profound level of the Dharma.
Main Content
Scriptures in the Tengyur Treatise Collection often focus on detailed analysis of the factors constituting reality (dharma) and the logical relationships among them. In the Mahayana tradition, especially the Madhyamaka school, a text such as Toh 4155 may explore the empty nature of all phenomena—not absolute nothingness, but the absence of an independent intrinsic nature (svabhāva-śūnyatā).
The scripture may discuss how the conscious mind (citta) does not exist independently but is always related to objects of cognition, or how the mistaken conception (avidyā) that things possess intrinsic existence is the root of suffering. Particularly in the Northern Tibetan tradition, this analysis leads to a clear understanding of mind according to either the Mind-Only school, Cittamātra, or Madhyamaka, depending on the school to which the text belongs.
The structure of the commentary generally proceeds in three stages: posing the question, debating opposing views, and then establishing the correct conclusion in accordance with the Dharma.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.