Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Mahāyāna — Northern Canon · Linh Sơn Vietnamese Mahāyāna Canon

大般若波羅蜜多經

Chinese title:大般若波羅蜜多經

📖8,549 words · ~34 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

08

Furthermore, Subhuti, what do you think? Is the name “eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “permanence of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “permanence of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “impermanence of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “impermanence of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “bliss of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “bliss of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “suffering of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “suffering of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “self of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “self of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “non-self of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “non-self of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “purity of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “purity of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “impurity of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “impurity of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “emptiness of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “emptiness of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “non-emptiness of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “non-emptiness of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “having characteristics of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “having characteristics of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “characterlessness of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “characterlessness of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “having aspirations of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “having aspirations of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “aspirationlessness of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “aspirationlessness of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “quiescence of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “quiescence of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “non-quiescence of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “non-quiescence of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “seclusion of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “seclusion of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “non-seclusion of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “non-seclusion of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “conditioned nature of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “conditioned nature of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “unconditioned nature of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “unconditioned nature of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “with outflows of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “with outflows of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “without outflows of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “without outflows of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “arising of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “arising of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “cessation of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “cessation of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “wholesomeness of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “wholesomeness of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “non-wholesomeness of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “non-wholesomeness of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “culpability of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “culpability of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “blamelessness of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “blamelessness of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “having afflictions of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “having afflictions of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “being free from afflictions of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “being free from afflictions of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “worldly nature of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “worldly nature of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “supramundane nature of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “supramundane nature of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the name “defilement of the eye dhatu” itself a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Are the names “defilement of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus” themselves a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “pure” of the eye dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “pure” of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” of the eye dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” of the eye dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “internal” of the eye dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “internal” of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “external” of the eye dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “external” of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “between the two” of the eye dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “between the two” of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “apprehensible” of the eye dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “apprehensible” of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “unapprehensible” of the eye dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “unapprehensible” of the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

Furthermore, Subhuti! What do you think? Is the designation of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “permanent” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “permanent” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “impermanent” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “impermanent” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “pleasant” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “pleasant” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “suffering” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “suffering” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “self” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “self” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “non-self” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “non-self” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “pure” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “pure” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “impure” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “impure” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “empty” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “empty” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “not empty” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “not empty” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “having characteristics” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “having characteristics” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “characterless” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “characterless” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “having aspiration” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “having aspiration” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “aspirationless” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “aspirationless” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “quiescent” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “quiescent” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “not quiescent” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “not quiescent” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “separated” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “separated” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “not separated” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “not separated” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “conditioned” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “conditioned” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “unconditioned” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “unconditioned” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “with outflows” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “with outflows” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “without outflows” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “without outflows” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “arising” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “arising” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “cessation” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “cessation” of the sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental-object dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One! No!

– Is the designation “wholesome” of the form dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “wholesome” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “unwholesome” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “unwholesome” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “culpable” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “culpable” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “blameless” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “blameless” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “with afflictions” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “with afflictions” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “without afflictions” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “without afflictions” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “mundane” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “mundane” with respect to the mundane realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “supramundane” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “supramundane” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “defiled” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “defiled” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “pure” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “pure” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “internal” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “internal” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “external” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “external” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “between the two” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “between the two” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “apprehensible” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “apprehensible” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “inapprehensible” with respect to the realm of visible form a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “inapprehensible” with respect to the realms of sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

Furthermore, Subhuti, what do you think? Is the designation “the eye-consciousness dhatu” a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus” a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “permanent” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “permanent” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “impermanent” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “impermanent” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “pleasant” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “pleasant” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “suffering” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “suffering” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “self” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “self” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “non-self” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “non-self” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “pure” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “pure” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “impure” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “impure” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “empty” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “empty” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “not empty” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “not empty” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “with characteristics” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “with characteristics” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “signless” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “signless” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “with aspiration” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “with aspiration” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “wishless” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “wishless” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “quiescent” with respect to the eye-consciousness dhatu a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation “quiescent” with respect to the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a bodhisattva-mahasattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “not tranquil” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “not tranquil” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “separated” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “separated” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “not separated” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “not separated” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “conditioned” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “conditioned” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “unconditioned” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “unconditioned” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “with outflows” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “with outflows” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “without outflows” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “without outflows” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “arising” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “arising” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “cessation” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “cessation” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “wholesome” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “wholesome” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “not wholesome” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “not wholesome” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “blameworthy” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “blameworthy” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “blameless” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “blameless” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “with afflictions” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “with afflictions” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “without afflictions” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “without afflictions” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “mundane” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “mundane” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “supramundane” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “supramundane” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “defiled” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “defiled” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “pure” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “pure” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “belonging to samsara” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “belonging to nirvana” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “internal” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “internal” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “external” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “external” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “between the two” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “between the two” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “apprehensible” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “apprehensible” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “unapprehensible” of the eye-consciousness dhatu a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “unapprehensible” of the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousness dhatus a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

Furthermore, Subhuti, regarding what is called a great bodhisattva, what do you think? Is the designation “eye-contact” a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-contact” a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “permanent” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “permanent” of ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “impermanent” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “impermanent” of ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “pleasant” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “pleasant” of ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “painful” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “painful” of ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “self” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “self” of ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the designation “non-self” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “non-self” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “pure” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “pure” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “impure” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “impure” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “empty” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “empty” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “not empty” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “not empty” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “having characteristics” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “having characteristics” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “characterless” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “characterless” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “having aspiration” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “having aspiration” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “aspirationless” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “aspirationless” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “quiescent” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “quiescent” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “not quiescent” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “not quiescent” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “separated” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “separated” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “not separated” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “not separated” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “conditioned” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “conditioned” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “unconditioned” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “unconditioned” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “with outflows” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “with outflows” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “without outflows” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “without outflows” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “arising” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “arising” of the arising of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “cessation” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “cessation” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “wholesome” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “wholesome” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “not wholesome” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “not wholesome” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “culpable” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “culpable” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “blameless” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “blameless” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “with afflictions” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “with afflictions” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “without afflictions” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “without afflictions” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “mundane” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “mundane” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “supramundane” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “supramundane” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “defiled” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “defiled” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “purified” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “purified” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “belonging to samsara” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “belonging to samsara” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “belonging to nirvana” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “belonging to nirvana” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “internal” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “internal” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “external” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “external” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “between the two” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “between the two” of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “apprehensible” of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the apprehensible designation of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the inapprehensible designation of eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the inapprehensible designation of ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

Furthermore, Subhuti! What do you think? Is the designation of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the permanence of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the permanence of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the impermanence of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the impermanence of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the pleasure of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the pleasure of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the suffering of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the suffering of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the selfhood of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the selfhood of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the selflessness of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the selflessness of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the purity of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the purity of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the impurity of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the impurity of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the emptiness of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the emptiness of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the nonemptiness of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the nonemptiness of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the possession of characteristics by the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the possession of characteristics by the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the signlessness of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the signlessness of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the presence of aspiration in the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the presence of aspiration in the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the wishlessness of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the wishlessness of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the quiescence of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the quiescence of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the nonquiescence of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the nonquiescence of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the detachment of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the detachment of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the nondetachment of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the nondetachment of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the conditioned nature of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the conditioned nature of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the unconditioned nature of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the unconditioned nature of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the contaminated nature of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the contaminated nature of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the uncontaminated nature of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the uncontaminated nature of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the arising of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the arising of the feelings that arise conditioned by ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact—their arising—a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the designation of the cessation of the feelings that arise conditioned by eye-contact a great bodhisattva?

– No, Blessed One!

– Is the very designation “ceased” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “wholesome” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “wholesome” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “unwholesome” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “unwholesome” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “culpable” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “culpable” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “blameless” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “blameless” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “with afflictions” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “with afflictions” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “without afflictions” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “without afflictions” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “worldly” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “worldly” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions—the worldly—a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “supramundane” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “supramundane” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “defiled” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “defiled” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “pure” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “pure” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “belonging to samsara” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “belonging to samsara” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “belonging to nirvana” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “belonging to nirvana” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “internal” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “internal” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “external” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “external” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “between the two” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “between the two” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “apprehensible” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “apprehensible” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “inapprehensible” of the feelings that arise with eye-contact as condition a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

– Is the very designation “inapprehensible” of the feelings that arise with ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact as conditions a great bodhisattva?

– Blessed One, no!

Volume 18

End

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

The version you're viewing was faithfully rendered by Inti AI in keeping with the tradition. Switch to the other language tab to read a human translation.

Translation source: Linh Sơn Pháp Bảo Đại Tạng KinhLicense: Linh Sơn Pháp Bảo Đại Tạng Kinh (Việt dịch) · nguồn: rongmotamhon.net (Liên Phật Hội) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.